Paper · 1979 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The use of antibiotic fermentation wastes as fertilizers for tomatoes

M. W. M. Bewick

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY An investigation was carried out into the potential of tylosin and terramycin fermentation wastes as fertilizers for tomatoes. Each waste was added at concentrations equivalent to 1 tN/ha to John Innes base compost. Each waste provided the sole source of nitrogen for the crop. Controls were set up with inorganic nitrogen applied at 1 tN/ha and 0·2 tN/ha, the quantity of nitrogen normally found in John Innes potting compost. Comparisons were also made between wet and dry terramycin waste. Each treatment was added to normal John Innes base compost and John Innes base minus one part peat, to determine the potential of antibiotic fermentation waste as a peat substitute. The size, weight and antibiotic content of the tomatoes produced were determined. The use of antibiotic fermentation wastes delayed the onset of tomato production due to the slow release of nitrogen. Final yields were not significantly different from the control treatments except in the tylosin treatment which produced the highest yield, both in terms of weight and numbers, of all the treatments. The reduction in the amount of peat in the base compost only appeared to affect the control treatments, where a delay in the onset of tomato production was seen in the control low in peat. No antibiotic was detected in any of the tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibiotic fermentation wastes delayed tomato production onset.

Treatment
antibiotic fermentation wastese0
Outcome
onset of tomato productione0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
slow release of nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of antibiotic fermentation wastes delayed the onset of tomato production due to the slow release of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Final tomato yields under wastes were generally not significantly different from controls.

Taxon
antibiotic fermentation wastes as fertilizers for tomatoest0
Treatment
wastest0
Outcome
Final yieldse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Final yields were not significantly different from the control treatments except in the tylosin treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“antibiotic fermentation wastes as fertilizers for tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tylosin waste produced the highest yield by weight.

Treatment
tylosin treatmente0
Outcome
yield, both in terms of weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tylosin treatment which produced the highest yield, both in terms of weight and numbers, of all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tylosin waste produced the highest yield by number.

Treatment
tylosin treatmente0
Outcome
numberse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tylosin treatment which produced the highest yield, both in terms of weight and numbers, of all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing peat delayed production onset in the low peat control.

Treatment
reduction in the amount of peate0
Outcome
onset of tomato productione0
Direction
delaye0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in the amount of peat in the base compost only appeared to affect the control treatments, where a delay in the onset of tomato production was seen in the control low in peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No antibiotic was detected in tomatoes.

Outcome
antibiotic was detectede0
Direction
Noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No antibiotic was detected in any of the tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1321 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.