Paper · 2006 · Moor Journal of Agricultural Research

Determination of appropriate decomposition period of two organic materials for effective control of root-knot nematodes on okra

EI Nwanguma; B Fawole

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of fruit peelings and cow dung used as soil amendments each at the rates of 0, 4, 8, and 16t ha-1 in the control of root-knot nematodes on' okra was tested in two field trials at the National Horticultural Research Institute, Ibadan. The organic wastes were each ploughed 0,20m into the soil and were subjected to three decomposition periods of two, four and six weeks before okra seeds were sown. The plots that were not amended served as the control treatment. The layout was a 2 x 4 x 3 factorial experiment in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The results showed a consistent decline in nematode population and increase in yield of okra with increasing rate of each soil amendment. Regardless of each type of organic waste, six week­ decomposed wastes reduced nematode populations and improved yield more than two­-week decomposed manure. While the plants in fruit peelings amended soil recorded a higher level of nematode population reduction by 68.1% and resulted in a yield increase of 89.2% over the control, cow dung reduced nematode population by 64.6% with resultant yield increase of 30.9%. While the effect of year of study (Y) was not significant for the assessed parameters, the interaction between manure rate (M) at 16t ha-1 and decomposition period of six weeks recorded the best significant suppressive effect on nematode population and enhanced the yield of okra. The overall results thus suggest that the efficacy of fruit peelings was significantly better in nematode control, enhanced plant growth and yield response over the corresponding effect of cow dung on the measured parameters. Keywords: decomposition period, cow dung, fruit peelings, root-knot nematodes Moor Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 5(1) 2004: 19-25

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode population declined with increasing rate of each soil amendment.

Treatment
increasing rate of each soil amendmente0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynet1pest
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consistent decline in nematode population and increase in yield of okra with increasing rate of each soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“root-knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra yield rose with increasing rate of each amendment.

Treatment
increasing rate of each soil amendmente0
Outcome
yield of okrae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consistent decline in nematode population and increase in yield of okra with increasing rate of each soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-week decomposed wastes reduced nematode populations more than two-week decomposed manure.

Treatment
six week­ decomposed wastese0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynet1pest
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
two­-week decomposed manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six week­ decomposed wastes reduced nematode populations and improved yield more than two­-week decomposed manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“root-knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-week decomposed wastes improved okra yield more than two-week decomposed manure.

Treatment
six week­ decomposed wastese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
two­-week decomposed manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six week­ decomposed wastes reduced nematode populations and improved yield more than two­-week decomposed manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit peelings reduced nematode population by 68.1% relative to control.

Treatment
fruit peelingse0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynet1pest
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
68.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit peelings amended soil recorded a higher level of nematode population reduction by 68.1% and resulted in a yield increase of 89.2% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“root-knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit peelings increased okra yield by 89.2% over control.

Treatment
fruit peelingse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
89.2%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit peelings amended soil recorded a higher level of nematode population reduction by 68.1% and resulted in a yield increase of 89.2% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung reduced nematode population by 64.6%.

Treatment
cow dunge0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynet1pest
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
64.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cow dung reduced nematode population by 64.6% with resultant yield increase of 30.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“root-knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung increased okra yield by 30.9%.

Treatment
cow dunge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cow dung reduced nematode population by 64.6% with resultant yield increase of 30.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Study year had no significant effect on assessed parameters.

Outcome
assessed parameterse0
Qualifier
year of study (Y)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of year of study (Y) was not significant for the assessed parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of 16t ha-1 manure and six weeks decomposition produced the strongest significant nematode suppression.

Treatment
manure rate (M) at 16t ha-1 and decomposition period of six weekse0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynet1pest
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
suppressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between manure rate (M) at 16t ha-1 and decomposition period of six weeks recorded the best significant suppressive effect on nematode population and enhanced the yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“root-knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of 16t ha-1 manure and six weeks decomposition enhanced okra yield.

Treatment
manure rate (M) at 16t ha-1 and decomposition period of six weekse0
Outcome
yield of okrae0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between manure rate (M) at 16t ha-1 and decomposition period of six weeks recorded the best significant suppressive effect on nematode population and enhanced the yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit peelings were significantly better than cow dung for nematode control.

Treatment
fruit peelingse0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynet1pest
Outcome
nematode controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
cow dunge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of fruit peelings was significantly better in nematode control, enhanced plant growth and yield response over the corresponding effect of cow dung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“root-knot nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit peelings improved plant growth and yield response relative to cow dung.

Treatment
fruit peelingse0
Outcome
plant growth and yield responsee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
cow dunge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacy of fruit peelings was significantly better in nematode control, enhanced plant growth and yield response over the corresponding effect of cow dung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–127 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.