Paper · 2007 · Plant Disease

Effects of Tillage Practices on Dissemination and Spatial Patterns of Heterodera glycines and Soybean Yield

W. L. Gavassoni; G. L. Tylka; G. P. Munkvold

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted in central Iowa to assess the effects of tillage on Heterodera glycines dissemination and reproduction and soybean (Glycine max) yield. Plots in both experiments were artificially infested with equivalent numbers of H. glycines cysts. In one experiment, plots were left noninfested or received aggregated or uniform infestation, and a susceptible soybean cultivar was grown for 3 years. By the end of the first growing season and through the second, H. glycines population densities were consistently greater (P ≤ 0.05) in uniformly infested plots than in plots with aggregated infestations. No differences in soybean yield among the treatments were detected. In a second experiment, a 1-m 2 area of each plot was infested with H. glycines cysts, susceptible soybeans were grown for four seasons, and crop residue was managed with either ridge-, conventional-, reduced-, or no-tillage. After 1 year, nematode population densities were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments than in no- and ridge-tillage treatments. After 2 years, H. glycines had been disseminated 6.9 m from the infestation site in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments but only 0.5 and 1.4 m for no-tillage and ridge-tillage treatments, respectively. After 3 years, H. glycines population densities were 10 times greater in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments than in the no-tillage treatment; conventional-tillage was the only treatment with yield significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) than the noninfested control. Aggregation of H. glycines eggs was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in no- and ridge-tillage treatments than in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments. Results indicate tillage can quickly disseminate H. glycines in newly infested fields, facilitating more rapid nematode reproduction and subsequent yield loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniform infestation produced greater H. glycines densities than aggregated infestation through the second season.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
uniformly infested plotse0
Interactor
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0pathogen
Outcome
H. glycines population densitiese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plots with aggregated infestationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H. glycines population densities were consistently greater (P ≤ 0.05) in uniformly infested plots than in plots with aggregated infestations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield did not differ among infestation treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in soybean yield among the treatments were detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After one year, nematode density was greater under conventional and reduced tillage than under no and ridge tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional- and reduced-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
Heterodera glycinesHeterodera glycinest0pathogen
Outcome
nematode population densitiese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
no- and ridge-tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 1 year, nematode population densities were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments than in no- and ridge-tillage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Tillage Practices on Dissemination and Spatial Patterns of Heterodera glycines and Soybean Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After two years, H. glycines spread 6.9 m under conventional and reduced tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional- and reduced-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0pathogen
Outcome
H. glycines had been disseminatede0
Direction
disseminatede0
Value
6.9 me0
Comparator
no-tillage and ridge-tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 2 years, H. glycines had been disseminated 6.9 m from the infestation site in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments but only 0.5 and 1.4 m for no-tillage and ridge-tillage treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After two years, H. glycines spread 0.5 m under no tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Interactor
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0pathogen
Outcome
H. glycines had been disseminatede0
Direction
onlye0
Value
0.5e0
Comparator
conventional- and reduced-tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 2 years, H. glycines had been disseminated 6.9 m from the infestation site in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments but only 0.5 and 1.4 m for no-tillage and ridge-tillage treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After two years, H. glycines spread 1.4 m under ridge tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
ridge-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0pathogen
Outcome
H. glycines had been disseminatede0
Direction
onlye0
Value
1.4 me0
Comparator
conventional- and reduced-tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 2 years, H. glycines had been disseminated 6.9 m from the infestation site in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments but only 0.5 and 1.4 m for no-tillage and ridge-tillage treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three years, H. glycines density was tenfold greater under conventional and reduced tillage than no tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional- and reduced-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0pathogen
Outcome
H. glycines population densitiese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10 timese0
Comparator
no-tillage treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 3 years, H. glycines population densities were 10 times greater in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments than in the no-tillage treatment;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage reduced soybean yield relative to noninfested control.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional-tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
noninfested controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional-tillage was the only treatment with yield significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) than the noninfested control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H. glycines egg aggregation was greater under no and ridge tillage than conventional and reduced tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no- and ridge-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0pathogen
Outcome
Aggregation of H. glycines eggse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional- and reduced-tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aggregation of H. glycines eggs was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in no- and ridge-tillage treatments than in conventional- and reduced-tillage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–101 · show in text ↑

infection · Heterodera glycines · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · Heterodera glycines · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.