Paper · 2011

Application of silica before sowing negatively affects growth and survival of rice following submergence

Evangelina S. Ella; Maribel L. Dionisio‐Sese; Abdelbagi M. Ismail

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Vast rainfed lowland areas in Asia periodically experience flash floods that adversely affect the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Progress has been made in developing tolerant germplasm, but fewer efforts have been devoted to developing proper management options for flood-prone areas. The effects of silica application (600 kg SiO2 ha ) in soil 1 d before sowing on the growth and survival of 21-dold seedlings submerged for 12 d were evaluated in two experiments. Four contrasting cultivars, tolerant IR49830-7-1-2-3 and Swarna-Sub1 and intolerant IR42 and Swarna, were used. Dry weight, chlorophyll concentration, shoot length, and non-structural carbohydrates were measured before and after complete submergence, and survival was determined 21 d after de-submergence. Survival of all genotypes decreased substantially in Si-treated seedlings, with the tolerant genotypes showing consistently higher survival. No significant interaction was observed between Si treatment and genotypes varying in tolerance of flooding. Si-treated seedlings had lower root dry weight and root-shoot biomass ratio, and greater chlorophyll concentration before submergence. Greater shoot elongation and higher reduction in levels of chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations during complete submergence and greater chlorophyllase activity 1 d after de-submergence were observed in Si-treated seedlings than in the control, and similarly in the sensitive genotypes than in tolerant ones. Survival was negatively correlated with chlorophyll degradation, extent of non-structural carbohydrate depletion, and shoot elongation during submergence. Apparently, excessive Si application in soil 1 d before sowing has negative consequences on seedling growth and survival after complete submergence at vegetative stage in rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica application before sowing decreased survival of all rice genotypes after submergence.

Organ / stage
21-dold seedlingse1
Treatment
silica applicatione1
Outcome
Survival of all genotypese2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of silica application (600 kg SiO2 ha ) in soil 1 d before sowing on the growth and survival of 21-dold seedlings submerged for 12 d were evaluated in two experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–485 · show in text ↑
e2

“Survival of all genotypes decreased substantially in Si-treated seedlings, with the tolerant genotypes showing consistently higher survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–932 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant rice genotypes showed higher survival than intolerant ones.

Material
tolerant genotypese2
Outcome
survivale2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e2

“Survival of all genotypes decreased substantially in Si-treated seedlings, with the tolerant genotypes showing consistently higher survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant interaction was found between silica treatment and genotypes varying in flooding tolerance.

Outcome
interactione3
Qualifier
between Si treatment and genotypes varying in tolerance of floodinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant interaction was observed between Si treatment and genotypes varying in tolerance of flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si-treated rice seedlings had lower root dry weight and root-shoot biomass ratio.

Treatment
Si-treatede4
Outcome
root dry weight and root-shoot biomass ratioe4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“Si-treated seedlings had lower root dry weight and root-shoot biomass ratio, and greater chlorophyll concentration before submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si-treated rice seedlings had greater chlorophyll concentration before submergence.

Treatment
Si-treatede4
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione4
Direction
greatere4
Qualifier
before submergencee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“Si-treated seedlings had lower root dry weight and root-shoot biomass ratio, and greater chlorophyll concentration before submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During complete submergence, Si-treated seedlings had greater shoot elongation than the control.

Treatment
Si-treatede5
Outcome
shoot elongatione5
Direction
Greatere5
Qualifier
during complete submergencee5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Greater shoot elongation and higher reduction in levels of chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations during complete submergence and greater chlorophyllase activity 1 d after de-submergence were observed in Si-treated seedlings than in the control, and similarly in the sensitive genotypes than in tolerant ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During complete submergence, Si-treated seedlings showed a higher reduction in chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations than the control.

Treatment
Si-treatede5
Outcome
levels of chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrationse5
Direction
higher reductione5
Qualifier
during complete submergencee5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Greater shoot elongation and higher reduction in levels of chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations during complete submergence and greater chlorophyllase activity 1 d after de-submergence were observed in Si-treated seedlings than in the control, and similarly in the sensitive genotypes than in tolerant ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si-treated rice seedlings had greater chlorophyllase activity 1 d after de-submergence than the control.

Treatment
Si-treatede5
Outcome
chlorophyllase activitye5
Direction
greatere5
Qualifier
1 d after de-submergencee5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Greater shoot elongation and higher reduction in levels of chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations during complete submergence and greater chlorophyllase activity 1 d after de-submergence were observed in Si-treated seedlings than in the control, and similarly in the sensitive genotypes than in tolerant ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1506 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive rice genotypes showed similar responses to Si in shoot elongation as tolerant ones.

Material
sensitive genotypese5
Outcome
shoot elongatione5
Direction
similarlye5
Comparator
tolerant onese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“Greater shoot elongation and higher reduction in levels of chlorophyll and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations during complete submergence and greater chlorophyllase activity 1 d after de-submergence were observed in Si-treated seedlings than in the control, and similarly in the sensitive genotypes than in tolerant ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1506 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival of rice seedlings was negatively correlated with chlorophyll degradation, non-structural carbohydrate depletion and shoot elongation during submergence.

Treatment
submergencee6
Outcome
Survivale6
Direction
negatively correlatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e6

“Survival was negatively correlated with chlorophyll degradation, extent of non-structural carbohydrate depletion, and shoot elongation during submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive silica application before sowing apparently has negative consequences for rice seedling growth and survival after complete submergence at the vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee7
Treatment
excessive Si application in soil 1 d before sowinge7
Outcome
seedling growth and survivale7
Direction
negativee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the survival and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–149 · show in text ↑
e7

“Apparently, excessive Si application in soil 1 d before sowing has negative consequences on seedling growth and survival after complete submergence at vegetative stage in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1838 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 157 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Adding silicon during reproduction increased straw dry weight by 243%.

    Effect of silicon on the growth of rice plant at different growth stages · 1989 · compared with solution devoid of silicon throughout the growth period

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.