Paper · 2011 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Effects of relay inter-cropping summer cover crops with maize on cover crop biomass and maize yields in a warm-temperate region of South Africa

F.S. Murungu; C. Chiduza; P. Muchaonyerwa

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Little research attention has been given to growing summer cover crops as part of conservation agriculture systems. Three cover crops (sorghum [Sorghum bicolor], mucuna [Mucuna pruriens] and sunhemp [Crotalaria juncea]) were relay-intercropped into maize [Zea mays] 42 days after planting maize. Biomass yields, N uptake and maize yield were measured. In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize. Nitrogen uptake followed a similar pattern with mucuna having the highest N-uptake of 70 kg N ha−1 in relay-intercropping as compared to the > 250 kg N ha−1 in the sole cropping system. Maize biomass and grain yields were not affected by relay-intercropping cover crops. The low cover crop biomass yields in relay-intercropping may not be viable for sustainable conservation agriculture. Keywords: Conservation agricultureC/N ratiomucunasorghumsunhemp

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1).

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Value
11 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sole cropping, sunhemp dry weight was 7.2 t ha−1, behind sorghum.

Taxon
sunhempe0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Value
7.2 t ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sole cropping, mucuna dry weight was 6.1 t ha−1, the lowest of the three cover crops.

Taxon
mucunaMucunae0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Value
6.1 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna
Mucuna · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)M108t · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay-intercropping into maize cut sorghum cover crop biomass yield by 85%, a significant drop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
relay-intercropped into maizee0
Outcome
cover crop biomass yieldse0
Direction
droppede0
Value
85%e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay-intercropping into maize cut sunhemp cover crop biomass yield by 70%, a significant drop.

Taxon
sunhempe0
Treatment
relay-intercropped into maizee0
Outcome
cover crop biomass yieldse0
Direction
droppede0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay-intercropping into maize cut mucuna cover crop biomass yield by 70%, a significant drop.

Taxon
mucunaMucunae0
Treatment
relay-intercropped into maizee0
Outcome
cover crop biomass yieldse0
Direction
droppede0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna
Mucuna · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)M108t · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sole cropping, sorghum had the highest dry weight (11 t ha−1) followed by sunhemp (7.2 t ha−1) and mucuna (6.1 t ha−1). However, cover crop biomass yields dropped significantly (85% for sorghum, 70% for sunhemp and mucuna) when relay-intercropped into maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucuna had the highest N uptake (70 kg N ha−1) under relay-intercropping, compared with more than 250 kg N ha−1 in sole cropping.

Taxon
mucunaMucunae1
Treatment
relay-intercroppinge1
Outcome
N-uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
70 kg N ha−1e1
Qualifier
> 250 kg N ha−1e1
Comparator
sole cropping systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna
Mucuna · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)M108t · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nitrogen uptake followed a similar pattern with mucuna having the highest N-uptake of 70 kg N ha−1 in relay-intercropping as compared to the > 250 kg N ha−1 in the sole cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay-intercropping cover crops did not affect maize biomass or grain yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse2
Treatment
relay-intercropping cover cropse2
Outcome
Maize biomass and grain yieldse2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maize biomass and grain yields were not affected by relay-intercropping cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–892 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low cover crop biomass in relay-intercropping may not be viable for sustainable conservation agriculture.

Taxon
cover crope3
Outcome
viable for sustainable conservation agriculturee3

Verbatim

e3

“The low cover crop biomass yields in relay-intercropping may not be viable for sustainable conservation agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1009 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.