Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Comparison of Dormant and Circum-bloom Zinc Spray Programs for Washington Apple Orchards

Frank J. Peryea

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Spraying high rates of inorganic zinc (Zn) salts during the late-dormant or delayed-dormant period has been a traditional practice to control Zn insufficiency in Pacific Northwest apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) orchards. Long-term use of such sprays can cause excessive soil accumulation of Zn. Using circum-bloom sprays of less phytotoxic Zn products may improve Zn phytoavailability and reduce Zn fertilizer requirements. A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees. Treatments were late-dormant sprays of zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) applied at medium and high rates, a single delayed-dormant spray of a medium rate of zinc oxide (ZnO) tank-mixed with horticultural oil, and multiple circum-bloom sprays of two organically complexed Zn products applied at much lower per-acre rates. No sprays were applied in the last year in order to evaluate carry-over effects. Zinc concentrations of unwashed and detergent plus acid-washed leaves (a procedure used to remove surface residues of the Zn sprays) sampled in August and of unwashed winter buds were used as indices of tree Zn status. The late- and delayed-dormant Zn sprays had no effect on leaf Zn concentration, which also was unaffected by washing in these treatments. The organically complexed Zn sprays substantially increased Zn concentrations in both unwashed and washed leaves. Washing reduced leaf Zn concentration in these treatments. There was no detectable lasting effect of the three previous seasons of Zn sprays on leaf Zn in the fourth year, or on bud Zn concentration during any winter following the sprays. None of the sprays influenced shoot growth or fruiting performance, or induced phytotoxicity symptoms. The results suggest that the two tested organically complexed Zn products, sprayed multiple times at low Zn rates starting slightly before bloom, can safely provide greater amounts of phytoavailable Zn than traditional dormant season sprays of high rates of inorganic Zn salts. They also validate the need for annual application of Zn and possibly Cu nutritional sprays.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late- and delayed-dormant Zn sprays had no effect on leaf Zn concentration in apple.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
late- and delayed-dormant Zn sprayse1
Outcome
leaf Zn concentratione1
Direction
no effecte1
Setting
field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“The late- and delayed-dormant Zn sprays had no effect on leaf Zn concentration, which also was unaffected by washing in these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organically complexed Zn sprays substantially increased Zn concentrations in unwashed and washed apple leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
organically complexed Zn sprayse1
Outcome
Zn concentrations in both unwashed and washed leavese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
substantiallye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organically complexed Zn sprays substantially increased Zn concentrations in both unwashed and washed leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1450 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing reduced leaf Zn concentration in the organically complexed Zn spray treatments of apple.

Treatment
Washinge1
Outcome
leaf Zn concentratione1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in these treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washing reduced leaf Zn concentration in these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No detectable lasting effect of three previous seasons of Zn sprays on leaf Zn in the fourth year, or on bud Zn concentration in any following winter, in apple.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
three previous seasons of Zn sprayse1
Outcome
leaf Zne1
Direction
no detectable lasting effecte1
Qualifier
bud Zn concentration during any winter following the sprayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no detectable lasting effect of the three previous seasons of Zn sprays on leaf Zn in the fourth year, or on bud Zn concentration during any winter following the sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spray programs did not influence shoot growth or fruiting performance, and induced no phytotoxicity symptoms, in apple.

Treatment
Zn spray programse0
Outcome
shoot growth or fruiting performance, or induced phytotoxicity symptomse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“None of the sprays influenced shoot growth or fruiting performance, or induced phytotoxicity symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two organically complexed Zn products applied several times at low rates from before bloom may safely supply more phytoavailable Zn to apple than traditional dormant high-rate inorganic Zn sprays.

Treatment
organically complexed Zn products, sprayed multiple times at low Zn rates starting slightly before bloome1
Outcome
phytoavailable Zne1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
safelye1
Comparator
traditional dormant season sprays of high rates of inorganic Zn saltse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results suggest that the two tested organically complexed Zn products, sprayed multiple times at low Zn rates starting slightly before bloom, can safely provide greater amounts of phytoavailable Zn than traditional dormant season sprays of high rates of inorganic Zn salts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–2070 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend annual application of Zn and possibly Cu nutritional sprays in apple orchards.

Treatment
annual application of Zn and possibly Cu nutritional sprayse1
Outcome
need for annual application of Zne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“They also validate the need for annual application of Zn and possibly Cu nutritional sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2072–2163 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing did not affect leaf Zn concentration in the late- and delayed-dormant Zn spray treatments of apple.

Treatment
washinge1
Outcome
leaf Zn concentratione1
Direction
unaffectede1
Qualifier
late- and delayed-dormant Zn sprayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-year field study was conducted comparing Zn phytoavailability and other effects of five Zn spray programs applied to ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“The late- and delayed-dormant Zn sprays had no effect on leaf Zn concentration, which also was unaffected by washing in these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1336 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

zinc atom · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

climate site · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 7 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.