Abstract
Abstract Two mungbean varieties, Guj‐1 and PIMS‐1 differing in their productivity potential, were examined to investigate their photosynthetic system at various stages of growth in relation to yield with two different dates of sowing. Vertical leaves were found to be beneficial. On the other hand, excessive leaf area during the later stages of growth may be detrimental to yield. Lower LAD at seedling stage and overall high NAR values may be reflected in higher grain yield. NAR declined as season progressed and this, in turn, may be related with increase in LAI. The grain yield was considerably more at the first date of sowing as compared to second date of sowing, the effect was being more pronounced in var. PIMS‐1 . Various environmental factors recorded at two different dates of sowing and at various stages of growth indicated that these factors may have influenced the yield potential at two different dates of sowing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield of mungbean was considerably higher at the first sowing date than at the second, more pronounced in PIMS‐1.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- first date of sowinge2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- considerably moree2
- Qualifier
- more pronounced in var. PIMS‐1e3
- Comparator
- second date of sowinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata [Roxb.] Wilczek)”
e2“The grain yield was considerably more at the first date of sowing as compared to second date of sowing”
e3“the effect was being more pronounced in var. PIMS‐1”
Claim · model-written summary
Vertical leaves were beneficial in mungbean.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- Vertical leavese4
- Qualifier
- beneficiale4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata [Roxb.] Wilczek)”
e4“Vertical leaves were found to be beneficial”
Claim · model-written summary
Excessive leaf area during the later stages of growth may be detrimental to mungbean yield.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- excessive leaf area during the later stages of growthe5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- detrimentale5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata [Roxb.] Wilczek)”
e5“excessive leaf area during the later stages of growth may be detrimental to yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower leaf area duration at seedling stage and high NAR may be reflected in higher mungbean grain yield.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Organ / stage
- seedling stagee6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- highere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata [Roxb.] Wilczek)”
e6“Lower LAD at seedling stage and overall high NAR values may be reflected in higher grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
NAR of mungbean declined as the season progressed.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- as season progressede7
- Outcome
- NARe7
- Direction
- declinede7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata [Roxb.] Wilczek)”
e7“NAR declined as season progressed”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.