Abstract
The post-emergence application of quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 at 15 DAS with one hand weeding at 25 DAS was the most effective and economical for controlling the grassy weeds in groundnut with maximum pod yield and haulm yield of 22.6 q ha−1 and 20.46 q ha−1, respectively. This treatment also minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 91.2, 84.1 and 89.7%, respectively over that of weedy check, resulting in better nutrient uptake by the crop. The maximum dry weed biomass at harvest was 250.3 g m−2 in weedy check followed by quizalofop ethyl @ 0.75 kg ha−1 at 25 DAS. The weed control efficiency was highest (72.3%) in application of quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 with one hand weeding, which gave maximum benefit-cost ratio of 2.49 and net return of Rs. 53067 ha−1 with additional income of Rs.36534 ha−1 over weedy check.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Quizalofop with hand weeding gave 22.6 q ha−1 pod yield.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 at 15 DAS with one hand weeding at 25 DASe0
- Interactor
- grassy weedse0weed
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 22.6 q ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 at 15 DAS with one hand weeding at 25 DAS was the most effective and economical for controlling the grassy weeds in groundnut with maximum pod yield and haulm yield of 22.6 q ha−1 and 20.46 q ha−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave 20.46 q ha−1 haulm yield.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 at 15 DAS with one hand weeding at 25 DASe0
- Interactor
- grassy weedse0weed
- Outcome
- haulm yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 20.46 q ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 at 15 DAS with one hand weeding at 25 DAS was the most effective and economical for controlling the grassy weeds in groundnut with maximum pod yield and haulm yield of 22.6 q ha−1 and 20.46 q ha−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced nitrogen removal by weeds by 91.2% relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- This treatmente0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weedse0
- Direction
- minimizede0
- Value
- 91.2e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment also minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 91.2, 84.1 and 89.7%, respectively over that of weedy check”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced phosphorus removal by weeds by 84.1% relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- This treatmente0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- phosphoruse0
- Direction
- minimizede0
- Value
- 84.1e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment also minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 91.2, 84.1 and 89.7%, respectively over that of weedy check”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced potash removal by weeds by 89.7% relative to weedy check.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- This treatmente0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- potash removal by weedse0
- Direction
- minimizede0
- Value
- 89.7%e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment also minimized nitrogen, phosphorus and potash removal by weeds to a tune of 91.2, 84.1 and 89.7%, respectively over that of weedy check”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment improved crop nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake by the crope0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“resulting in better nutrient uptake by the crop”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Weedy check had the maximum dry weed biomass, 250.3 g m−2.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- weedy checke0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- dry weed biomasse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 250.3 g m−2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum dry weed biomass at harvest was 250.3 g m−2 in weedy check”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Quizalofop plus hand weeding gave highest weed control efficiency at 72.3%.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 with one hand weedinge0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 72.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weed control efficiency was highest (72.3%) in application of quizalofop ethyl @1.0 kg ha−1 with one hand weeding”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave a maximum benefit-cost ratio of 2.49.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.49e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum benefit-cost ratio of 2.49”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave net return of Rs. 53067 ha−1.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- Rs. 53067 ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net return of Rs. 53067 ha−1”
e1“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced additional income of Rs.36534 ha−1 over weedy check.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Outcome
- additional incomee0
- Value
- Rs.36534 ha−1e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“additional income of Rs.36534 ha−1 over weedy check”
e1“groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →herbicide · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
127 papers more in this group
See all 131 papers →herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
226 papers more in this group
See all 230 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.