Paper · 2012 · Journal of Elementology

Effect of boron foliar application at critical growth stages on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) yield and quality

Petr Škarpa

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of the reported vegetation experiment, established in 2008-2011, was to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower. Four treatments were established in the experiment: 1) control – not fertilised with boron; 2) application of 300 g B ha–1 in the growing stage of 4 developed leaves (V-4); 3) application of 300 g B ha–1 at the beginning of elongation growth (R-1); and 4) split rate of boron application of 150 g B ha–1 at stage V-4 (4 developed leaves) and 150 g B ha–1 at stage R-1 (terminal bud forms). Foliar nutrition with boron increased the content of this element in leaves and stems, and raised the biomass production of sunflower plants. The increased uptake of nutrients by plants was essential for achene production. Application of boron fertilizer at stage V-4 increased the N content in the plant. Boron had a considerable effect on achene production. The highest increase in yields was related to the foliar boron application at stage V-4 (by 8.3% relatively). The relative increase in the oil content in response to boron application, which ranged within 1-2%, was not significant. The higher yields and a constant oil content increased oil production, most markedly after the boron foliar application at stage V-4 (by 10.2% ). It was only the content of stearic acid that was increased significantly by foliar application of B at stage V-4 and split application (by 8.8% and 9.4%, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron increased the boron content of sunflower leaves and stems.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Organ / stage
leaves and stemse2
Treatment
Foliar nutrition with borone2
Outcome
content of this elemente2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar nutrition with boron increased the content of this element in leaves and stems, and raised the biomass production of sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron raised sunflower biomass production.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Foliar nutrition with borone2
Outcome
biomass productione2
Direction
raisede2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar nutrition with boron increased the content of this element in leaves and stems, and raised the biomass production of sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron had a considerable effect on sunflower achene production.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Borone6
Outcome
achene productione6
Qualifier
considerable effecte6
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e6

“Boron had a considerable effect on achene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron at stage V-4 gave the highest sunflower yield increase, by 8.3%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
foliar boron application at stage V-4e3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
increasee3
Value
8.3%e3
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest increase in yields was related to the foliar boron application at stage V-4 (by 8.3% relatively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative increase in sunflower oil content from boron application was not significant, within 1-2%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
boron applicatione4
Outcome
oil contente4
Direction
increasee4
Value
1-2%e4
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e4

“The relative increase in the oil content in response to boron application, which ranged within 1-2%, was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron at stage V-4 increased sunflower oil production by 10.2%, most markedly.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
boron foliar application at stage V-4e5
Outcome
oil productione5
Direction
increasede5
Value
10.2%e5
Qualifier
most markedlye5
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e5

“The higher yields and a constant oil content increased oil production, most markedly after the boron foliar application at stage V-4 (by 10.2% )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron at stage V-4 significantly increased stearic acid content by 8.8%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
foliar application of B at stage V-4e7
Outcome
content of stearic acide7
Direction
increasede7
Value
8.8%e7
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e7

“It was only the content of stearic acid that was increased significantly by foliar application of B at stage V-4 and split application (by 8.8% and 9.4%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split foliar boron application significantly increased stearic acid content by 9.4%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
split applicatione7
Outcome
content of stearic acide7
Direction
increasede7
Value
9.4%e7
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e7

“It was only the content of stearic acid that was increased significantly by foliar application of B at stage V-4 and split application (by 8.8% and 9.4%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilizer applied at stage V-4 increased plant N content.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Application of boron fertilizer at stage V-4e7
Outcome
N contente7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to explore the effect of the date of foliar boron application on the yield and quality of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“control – not fertilised with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–274 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of boron fertilizer at stage V-4 increased the N content in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–878 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

boron atom · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

64 papers: 58 positive, 6 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

application · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 152 positive, 6 negative or no effect

151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.