Abstract
ABSTRACT Atechnique was developed for detecting the locations of chlorpyrifos (Lorsban 15G) and fonofos (Dyfonate lOG) granules after incorporation into soil. The technique involved treatment of the insecticide granules with iodine and a thin coating of lead dust. The granules were detected in soil samples with X-ray computed tomography (CAT scanning). Two field experiments were conducted to compare wireworm management in sweet potatoes and distributions of chlorpyrifos and fonofos granules after six different pesticide incorporation procedures. Analyses of variance indicated marked differences between incorporation procedures for dispersions of granules, locations of granules, and numbers of granules detected. Wireworm control with fonofos was effective for all incorporation procedures. For chlorpyrifos, the best wireworm control was with two incorporation procedures which dispersed the chemical to all soil in contact with the growing sweet potatoes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Iodine and lead dust treatment enabled X-ray CT detection of insecticide granules in soil.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoes
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatase1 - Treatment
- iodine and a thin coating of lead duste0
- Outcome
- granules were detected in soil samplese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Wireworm Management”
e0“The technique involved treatment of the insecticide granules with iodine and a thin coating of lead dust. The granules were detected in soil samples with X-ray computed tomography (CAT scanning).”
e1“wireworm management in sweet potatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Incorporation procedures differed markedly in granule dispersion, location and number detected.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase1
- Outcome
- dispersions of granules, locations of granules, and numbers of granules detectede0
- Comparator
- incorporation procedurese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“marked differences between incorporation procedures for dispersions of granules, locations of granules, and numbers of granules detected.”
e1“wireworm management in sweet potatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Fonofos controlled wireworms effectively under every incorporation procedure.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase1
- Treatment
- fonofose0
- Interactor
- wireworme0pest
- Outcome
- Wireworm controle0
- Direction
- effectivee0
- Comparator
- all incorporation procedurese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wireworm control with fonofos was effective for all incorporation procedures.”
e1“wireworm management in sweet potatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyrifos controlled wireworms best when incorporation dispersed it through soil contacting growing sweet potatoes.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
- Treatment
- chlorpyrifose0
- Interactor
- wireworme0pest
- Outcome
- wireworm controle0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- two incorporation procedurese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For chlorpyrifos, the best wireworm control was with two incorporation procedures which dispersed the chemical to all soil in contact with the growing sweet potatoes.”
The same questions in other papers
fonofos · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chlorpyrifos · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.