Paper · 2007 · International Journal of Agricultural Research

Incidence and Severity of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus under Phytopesticidal Management

S.B. Bhyan .; M.A.H. Chowdhury .; M.M. Alam .; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experimentation was made to investigate the incidence of tomato yellow leaf curl virus and its effect on the nutritional components in fruits and chlorophyll content in the leaves of Lycopersicon esculentum taken under phytopesticidal management. Phytopesticidal treatments used in the study were extracts of neem (Azadiracta indica) fruits, garlic (Allium sativum) bulbs, karamja (Pongamia pinnata) leaves and mehogoni (Swietenia macrophylla) seeds. Plots with no phytopesticidal treatments were used as control. Plants under no management were found to be in highest incidence of the virus. There were significant role of phytopesticides in reducing the incidence and severity of tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Among the treatments, Karamja extract performed best against TYLCV in all respect of yield and yield related parameters of tomato. Viral infection in tomato plants caused a negative effect on fruit nutrition. Though negative effect of TYLCV infection was found for chlorophyll A content in tomato leaves, but for chlorophyll B, it caused no significant effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytopesticides reduced the incidence and severity of tomato yellow leaf curl virus relative to plots with no management.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
phytopesticidese2
Interactor
tomato yellow leaf curl virusTomato yellow leaf curl viruse2pathogen
Outcome
incidence and severity of tomato yellow leaf curl viruse2
Direction
reducinge2
Comparator
no managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lycopersicon esculentum taken under phytopesticidal management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants under no management were found to be in highest incidence of the virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were significant role of phytopesticides in reducing the incidence and severity of tomato yellow leaf curl virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karamja extract performed best against TYLCV for yield and yield-related parameters of tomato among the treatments.

Treatment
Karamja extracte3
Interactor
TYLCVTomato yellow leaf curl viruse3pathogen
Outcome
yield and yield related parameterse3
Direction
performed beste3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Among the treatments, Karamja extract performed best against TYLCV in all respect of yield and yield related parameters of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Viral infection had a negative effect on fruit nutrition of tomato.

Treatment
Viral infectione4
Outcome
fruit nutritione4
Direction
negative effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Viral infection in tomato plants caused a negative effect on fruit nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TYLCV infection had a negative effect on chlorophyll A content in tomato leaves.

Treatment
TYLCV infectione5
Interactor
TYLCVTomato yellow leaf curl viruse5pathogen
Outcome
chlorophyll A contente5
Direction
negative effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Though negative effect of TYLCV infection was found for chlorophyll A content in tomato leaves, but for chlorophyll B, it caused no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TYLCV infection had no significant effect on chlorophyll B in tomato leaves.

Treatment
TYLCV infectione5
Interactor
TYLCVTomato yellow leaf curl viruse5pathogen
Outcome
chlorophyll Be5
Direction
no significant effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Though negative effect of TYLCV infection was found for chlorophyll A content in tomato leaves, but for chlorophyll B, it caused no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1076 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants under no management had the highest incidence of the virus.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
no managemente1
Outcome
incidence of the viruse1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lycopersicon esculentum taken under phytopesticidal management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants under no management were found to be in highest incidence of the virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–595 · show in text ↑

infection · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

infection · Tomato yellow leaf curl virus · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 7 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

botanical · Tomato yellow leaf curl virus · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.