Paper · 1983 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation on sugar beet at Broom's Barn 1973–8

P. J. Last; A. P. Draycott; A. B. Messem; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY During 1973–8 six field experiments examined the effect of 0, 41, 82, 124, 166 and 207 kg N/ha with and without irrigation on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. The culture of the crops was planned to produce a large yield in order to determine the optimal nitrogen application for the above-average crops which many growers are now seeking to produce. Ammonium nitrate was used as the nitrogen source, broadcast in one dose before sowing as was recommended practice in the early 1970s. The growth of the crop was monitored from the seedling stage to harvest in December, as was nitrogen uptake by the crop, and water removal from the soil using a neutron probe. In 3 years when the weather was dry after drilling, the fertilizer significantly depressed the number of plants which established but plant weights showed that some nitrogen fertilizer was needed early for rapid seedling growth. Changes in the method of applying fertilizer for sugar beet are therefore suggested and are being tested. Soil analyses in the plough layer during establishment (May–June) indicated an optimum concentration of mineral nitrogen of about 40 mg N/kg soil at this stage. Nitrogen fertilizer was very important for a high yield; throughout the growth of the crop it greatly increased total dry-matter yield and at final harvest this was reflected in sugar yield. Considering the six years together, sugar yield was linearly related to both dry-matter yield and total nitrogen uptake. However, within a year, increasing nitrogen uptake above 200 kg N/ha with nitrogen fertilizer did not increase sugar yield; maximum yields of sugar each year were normally obtained with 125 kg N/ha fertilizer or less, and irrigation had little effect on the optimum amount. Explanations for the lack of responsiveness of sugar beet to greater applications of nitrogen fertilizer are being sought in further more detailed analyses of the crop and its environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer significantly depressed plant establishment in three years with dry weather after drilling.

Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
number of plants which establishede0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
In 3 years when the weather was dry after drillinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 3 years when the weather was dry after drilling, the fertilizer significantly depressed the number of plants which established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant weights indicated that early nitrogen fertilizer was needed for rapid seedling growth.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
rapid seedling growthe0
Qualifier
needed earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant weights showed that some nitrogen fertilizer was needed early for rapid seedling growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest changes in sugar beet fertilizer application methods.

Outcome
Changes in the method of applying fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the method of applying fertilizer for sugar beet are therefore suggested and are being tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil analyses indicated an optimum mineral nitrogen concentration of about 40 mg N/kg soil during establishment.

Outcome
concentration of mineral nitrogene0
Direction
optimume0
Value
about 40 mg N/kg soile0
Qualifier
during establishment (May–June)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil analyses in the plough layer during establishment (May–June) indicated an optimum concentration of mineral nitrogen of about 40 mg N/kg soil at this stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer greatly increased total dry-matter yield throughout growth.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
total dry-matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer was very important for a high yield; throughout the growth of the crop it greatly increased total dry-matter yield and at final harvest this was reflected in sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased sugar yield at final harvest.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at final harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer was very important for a high yield; throughout the growth of the crop it greatly increased total dry-matter yield and at final harvest this was reflected in sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across six years, sugar yield was linearly related to dry-matter yield and nitrogen uptake.

Outcome
sugar yielde0
Qualifier
linearly related to both dry-matter yield and total nitrogen uptakee0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considering the six years together, sugar yield was linearly related to both dry-matter yield and total nitrogen uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within a year, fertilizer-induced nitrogen uptake above 200 kg N/ha did not increase sugar yield.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
nitrogen uptake above 200 kg N/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“within a year, increasing nitrogen uptake above 200 kg N/ha with nitrogen fertilizer did not increase sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum annual sugar yields were normally obtained with 125 kg N/ha fertilizer or less.

Treatment
125 kg N/ha fertilizer or lesse0
Outcome
yields of sugare0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
normallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yields of sugar each year were normally obtained with 125 kg N/ha fertilizer or less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had little effect on the optimum nitrogen fertilizer amount.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
optimum amounte0
Qualifier
little effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation had little effect on the optimum amount.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1762 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.