Paper · 2015 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Control of tomato bacterial wilt and root-knot diseases by Bacillus thuringiensis CR-371 and Streptomyces avermectinius NBRC14893

Mohsen Mohamed Elsharkawy; Mai Nakatani; Mitsuyoshi Nishimura; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ralstonia solanacearum and Meloidogyne incognita are two soilborne pathogens that cause serious damage and great losses in the production of tomato. For this purpose, a bacterial isolate, Bacillus thuringiensis CR-371, and an actinomyces isolate, Streptomyces avermectinius NBRC14893, were examined for their ability to protect tomato from root-knot nematode and bacterial wilt diseases under glasshouse conditions. Treatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 followed by challenge inoculation with R. solanacearum and M. incognita significantly decreased disease severity of bacterial wilt alone, root-knot nematode alone, or mixed infection by both pathogens compared to the control. Furthermore, pretreatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 significantly reduced bacterial proliferation of R. solanacearum both in pathogen alone inoculated plants and in plants co-inoculated with R. solanacearum and M. incognita. In conclusion, our results suggest that the treatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 simultaneously suppresses bacterial wilt and root-knot nematode diseases. Therefore, B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 could provide new options for integrated pest management strategies against plant diseases, especially against bacterial-nematode disease complexes that cause synergistic yield losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microbial root treatment reduced bacterial wilt severity versus control.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893e0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Second interactor
B. thuringiensis CR-371Bacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severity of bacterial wilt alonee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 followed by challenge inoculation with R. solanacearum and M. incognita significantly decreased disease severity of bacterial wilt alone, root-knot nematode alone, or mixed infection by both pathogens compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microbial root treatment reduced root-knot disease severity versus control.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
S. avermectinius NBRC14893Streptomyces avermitilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-knot nematode alonee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces avermitilis
Streptomyces avermitilis · Second interactor현태웅 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 followed by challenge inoculation with R. solanacearum and M. incognita significantly decreased disease severity of bacterial wilt alone, root-knot nematode alone, or mixed infection by both pathogens compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microbial root treatment reduced severity of mixed infection versus control.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893e0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Second interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
mixed infection by both pathogense0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · Second interactorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 followed by challenge inoculation with R. solanacearum and M. incognita significantly decreased disease severity of bacterial wilt alone, root-knot nematode alone, or mixed infection by both pathogens compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment reduced R. solanacearum proliferation in singly inoculated tomato.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893e0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Second interactor
B. thuringiensis CR-371Bacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bacterial proliferation of R. solanacearume0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
pathogen alone inoculated plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretreatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 significantly reduced bacterial proliferation of R. solanacearum both in pathogen alone inoculated plants and in plants co-inoculated with R. solanacearum and M. incognita.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment reduced R. solanacearum proliferation in coinoculated tomato.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893e0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Second interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial proliferation of R. solanacearume0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
plants co-inoculated with R. solanacearum and M. incognitae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · Second interactorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretreatment of tomato roots with B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 significantly reduced bacterial proliferation of R. solanacearum both in pathogen alone inoculated plants and in plants co-inoculated with R. solanacearum and M. incognita.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1002 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose both isolates for integrated management of bacterial–nematode disease complexes.

Outcome
integrated pest management strategies against plant diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. thuringiensis CR-371 and S. avermectinius NBRC14893 could provide new options for integrated pest management strategies against plant diseases, especially against bacterial-nematode disease complexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.