Paper · 2009 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Soil Solarization on Populations ofPythiumspp., FluorescentPseudomonas, and Damping-off of Broccoli and Cucumber

Samuel M. C. Njoroge; Joe E. Toler; Anthony P. Keinath

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil solarization is the use of solar radiation to disinfest moist soil covered with clear polyethylene mulch during warm months. Beneficial effects of soil solarization are lower pathogen populations, reduced disease, and higher yield. Information on the duration of solarization benefits is necessary to achieve effective and efficient implementation of this management strategy. A 3-year study investigated effects of single- and multiple-year soil solarization on Pythium spp., Pseudomonas spp., and damping-off of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Soil was solarized 10 weeks in 2003 only; 2004 only; 2003 and 2004; 2004 and 2005; 2003, 2004, and 2005; or not solarized. Soil was sampled from 0 to 10 cm deep and population densities of Pythium spp. and Pseudomonas spp. assayed at monthly intervals from the start of solarization until 2 months after solarization. Cucumber and broccoli were planted one month after solarization ended or plots were left fallow. During solarization, soil temperatures increased 2.5 to 4.5°C in solarized soils compared to those in nonsolarized soils. In general, microbial counts in all years were lower throughout the solarization period in solarized soils than in nonsolarized soils. During the 2-month period following solarization, Pythium spp. increased in soils solarized 1 or 2 years but not in soils solarized 3 years. However, postsolarization Pythium spp. densities in soils solarized 3 years were high enough that there were no differences in Pythium spp. densities among solarized soils. No differences in microbial populations were found among solarization treatments applied in the current year irrespective of whether the soil was previously solarized, planted, or fallowed. One year after solarization, there were no differences in population densities between soils solarized or not solarized the previous year. Incidences of damping-off were not different among treatments. Under conditions in the southeastern United States, soil solarization is a disinfestation method that should be applied each season prior to planting, because beneficial effects of reducing microbial populations do not persist in the following years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarized soils were 2.5 to 4.5°C warmer than nonsolarized soils.

Treatment
solarized soilse0
Outcome
soil temperaturese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.5 to 4.5°Ce0
Comparator
nonsolarized soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil temperatures increased 2.5 to 4.5°C in solarized soils compared to those in nonsolarized soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial counts were generally lower during solarization than in nonsolarized soil.

Treatment
solarized soilse0
Outcome
microbial countse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
nonsolarized soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial counts in all years were lower throughout the solarization period in solarized soils than in nonsolarized soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium populations increased after one or two years of solarization.

Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
Pythium spp. increasede0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pythium spp. increased in soils solarized 1 or 2 years but not in soils solarized 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium populations did not increase after three years of solarization.

Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
Pythium spp.e0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
soils solarized 3 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pythium spp. increased in soils solarized 1 or 2 years but not in soils solarized 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postsolarization Pythium densities did not differ among solarized soils.

Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
Pythium spp. densitiese0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences in Pythium spp. densities among solarized soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial populations did not differ among current-year solarization treatments regardless of prior solarization, planting or fallow.

Treatment
solarization treatmentse0
Outcome
microbial populationse0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
previously solarized, planted, or fallowede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in microbial populations were found among solarization treatments applied in the current year irrespective of whether the soil was previously solarized, planted, or fallowed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year later, microbial population densities did not differ between previously solarized and unsolarized soils.

Treatment
soils solarizede0
Outcome
population densitiese0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
not solarizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One year after solarization, there were no differences in population densities between soils solarized or not solarized the previous year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damping-off incidence did not differ among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Incidences of damping-offe0
Direction
not differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incidences of damping-off were not different among treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–1963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying soil solarization each season before planting in the southeastern United States.

Outcome
soil solarization is a disinfestation method that should be applied each season prior to plantinge0
Setting
southeastern United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions in the southeastern United States, soil solarization is a disinfestation method that should be applied each season prior to planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–112 · show in text ↑

solarization · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

solarization · soil: biology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.