Paper · 2000 · Weed Technology

Response of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidumL. var.durum) Cultivars to Imazamethabenz and PP-6041

JAIME LLOVERAS; JOSE GARCIA BAUDIN; JOSEP M. BALAGUE; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in the Mediterranean conditions of the Ebro Valley, Spain during 1995 to 1996 and 1996 to 1997 to determine the effects of imazamethabenz and PP-604 on selected durum wheat Triticum turgidum var. durum cultivars grown under irrigation. Herbicides were applied at their recommended rates of 600 g ai/ha for imazamethabenz and 375 g ai/ha for PP-604 and at twice these rates. Herbicide treatment reduced the average wheat height in three of four trials. Wheat treated with imazamethabenz was almost 2 cm shorter than wheat treated with PP-604 and almost 3 cm shorter than untreated control plants. However, durum wheat yields were not significantly reduced by treatment with imazamethabenz or PP-604 in any of the four trials, and no visible plant injury was observed. These results differ from reported yield reductions under Mediterranean dryland conditions, suggesting that durum wheat can be affected by imazamethabenz and PP-604 but irrigation enhances recovery from herbicide injury.Nomenclature: Imazamethabenz, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1-H-imidazol-2-yl]-4(and 5)-methylbenzoic acid (3:2); PP-604, 2-[1-ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5-(2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl)cyclohex-2-enone; durum wheat, Triticum turgidum L. var. durum.Additional index words: Herbicide rates, irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment reduced the average height of wheat in three of four trials.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmente0
Outcome
average wheat heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
three of four trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatment reduced the average wheat height in three of four trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat treated with imazamethabenz was almost 2 cm shorter than wheat treated with PP-604.

Treatment
imazamethabenze0
Outcome
shortere0
Direction
shortere0
Value
almost 2 cme0
Comparator
wheat treated with PP-604e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat treated with imazamethabenz was almost 2 cm shorter than wheat treated with PP-604 and almost 3 cm shorter than untreated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat treated with imazamethabenz was almost 3 cm shorter than untreated control plants.

Treatment
imazamethabenze0
Outcome
shortere0
Direction
shortere0
Value
almost 3 cme0
Comparator
untreated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat treated with imazamethabenz was almost 2 cm shorter than wheat treated with PP-604 and almost 3 cm shorter than untreated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat yields were not significantly reduced by imazamethabenz in any of the four trials.

Treatment
imazamethabenze0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Qualifier
any of the four trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat yields were not significantly reduced by treatment with imazamethabenz or PP-604 in any of the four trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat yields were not significantly reduced by PP-604 in any of the four trials.

Treatment
PP-604e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Qualifier
any of the four trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat yields were not significantly reduced by treatment with imazamethabenz or PP-604 in any of the four trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–756 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No visible injury was observed in the durum wheat plants.

Outcome
visible plant injurye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no visible plant injury was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that durum wheat can be affected by imazamethabenz and PP-604 but that irrigation enhances recovery from herbicide injury.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
recovery from herbicide injurye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that durum wheat can be affected by imazamethabenz and PP-604 but irrigation enhances recovery from herbicide injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1019 · show in text ↑

imazamethabenz · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.