Paper · 2007 · Journal of Food Quality

MAINTAINING POSTHARVEST QUALITY OF THE TOMATO FRUIT BY EMPLOYING METHYL JASMONATE AND ETHANOL VAPOR TREATMENT

NIKOS G. TZORTZAKIS; COSTAS D. ECONOMAKIS

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The postharvest quality of tomato fruit ( Lycopersicon esculentum L.) was evaluated after treatment with natural volatile compounds (methyl jasmonate [MJ] or ethanol) and storage at 13C during or following vapor exposure. The fruit treated with natural volatiles did not differ on fruit decay during vapor exposure, but following exposure and transfer to ambient air, the fruit had less decay at storage temperature. Volatile‐treated fruit tended to maintain firmness during exposure, and the effects were significant for ethanol‐treated fruit, following storage to ambient air. Sugar (i.e., fructose and glucose) concentration was stimulated in ethanol‐treated fruit following exposure and transfer to ambient air. Ascorbic acid concentration was stimulated in MJ‐treated fruit during exposure and persisted (including ethanol treatment) following transfer to ambient air. Total phenolics declined during vapor exposure and increased for MJ‐treated fruit after transfer to ambient air. Lycopene concentration did not differ during MJ exposure but increased following volatile exposure. The fruit samples treated with vapors had accelerated percentage weight loss compared with untreated fruit during ripening but without commercial interest, whereas citric acid content did not differ among the treatments. The results suggest that MJ and ethanol vapor may improve fruit quality‐related attributes on top of the well‐documented antimicrobial protection during fresh produce storage and transit. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The data presented in this work suggest that the use of natural volatiles is an innovative and useful tool as an alternative to the use of synthetic fungicides or other sanitation techniques in storage/packaging. Vapor enrichment may reduce disease development with a major contribution to limiting the spread of the pathogen by lowering the spore load (spore production) in the storage/transit atmospheres as well as the use of natural volatiles as an alternative food preservative. In addition to these, the improvement of fruit quality observed in the present work is of great market importance. The effects of natural compounds on individual microorganisms (fungi and bacteria), both responsible for spoilage and foodborne pathogens, as well as the minimum concentration to gain effectiveness without affecting fresh produce quality and storage deserve further research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural volatile treatment did not change fruit decay during vapor exposure.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
natural volatilese0
Outcome
fruit decaye0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit treated with natural volatiles did not differ on fruit decay during vapor exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile-treated fruit had less decay after transfer to ambient air.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
exposuree0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
transfer to ambient aire0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“following exposure and transfer to ambient air, the fruit had less decay at storage temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile-treated fruit tended to maintain firmness during exposure.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
Volatile‐treatede0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
maintaine0
Qualifier
tended toe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Volatile‐treated fruit tended to maintain firmness during exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol-treated fruit had a significant firmness effect after transfer to ambient air.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
ethanol‐treatede0
Outcome
effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects were significant for ethanol‐treated fruit, following storage to ambient air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol treatment stimulated fructose and glucose concentrations after transfer to ambient air.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
ethanol‐treatede0
Outcome
Sugar (i.e., fructose and glucose) concentratione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar (i.e., fructose and glucose) concentration was stimulated in ethanol‐treated fruit following exposure and transfer to ambient air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl jasmonate stimulated ascorbic acid concentration during exposure.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
MJ‐treatede0
Outcome
Ascorbic acid concentratione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid concentration was stimulated in MJ‐treated fruit during exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ascorbic acid response persisted after transfer to ambient air, including ethanol-treated fruit.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
ethanol treatmente0
Outcome
persistede0
Direction
persistede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“persisted (including ethanol treatment) following transfer to ambient air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics declined during vapor exposure.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
vapor exposuree0
Outcome
Total phenolicse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolics declined during vapor exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics increased for methyl jasmonate-treated fruit after transfer to ambient air.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
MJ‐treatede0
Outcome
increasede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased for MJ‐treated fruit after transfer to ambient air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene concentration did not differ during methyl jasmonate exposure.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
MJ exposuree0
Outcome
Lycopene concentratione0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lycopene concentration did not differ during MJ exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene concentration increased following volatile exposure.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
volatile exposuree0
Outcome
Lycopene concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lycopene concentration did not differ during MJ exposure but increased following volatile exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vapor-treated fruit had accelerated percentage weight loss during ripening.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
vaporse0
Outcome
percentage weight losse0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit samples treated with vapors had accelerated percentage weight loss compared with untreated fruit during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid content did not differ among treatments.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
citric acid contente0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“citric acid content did not differ among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest methyl jasmonate and ethanol vapor may improve fruit quality attributes.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
MJ and ethanol vapore0
Outcome
improve fruit quality‐related attributese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MJ and ethanol vapor may improve fruit quality‐related attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑

(-)-methyl jasmonate · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.