Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

PREVIOUS CROPS AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN LETTUCE: EFFECTS ON YIELDS AND SOIL PROPERTIES

Rita Leogrande; Ornella Lopedota; Angelo Fiore; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of organic amendments in agriculture could sustain crop production and preserve the agroecosystem, due to their importance in the conservation of organic matter in soil. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of differing organic fertilizers and of previous crops on lettuce growth, nutritional status and yields. The effects on soil characteristics were further investigated. The research was carried out during two years (2006 and 2007) at Metaponto (MT) in southern Italy, on lettuce crops cultivated after eggplant and melon to avoid their continuous cropping. The effects of application of a mineral fertilizer (MF), and of three treatments with organic fertilizers (commercial stable manure - OM; anaerobic digestate based on wine distillery wastewater - AD; composted municipal solid organic wastes coming from the separate collection - MSW) were studied. Head average weight, leaf area index, nitrate content and SPAD readings during the cropping cycles did not show significant differences among fertilizer treatments. On the contrary, marketable yield and head average weight at the harvest presented significantly different among the three organic fertilizers. The average marketable yield and head average weight of organic fertilizers experimental (AD and MSW treatments) decreased of 16 and 17%, respectively, compared to OM treatment. The previous melon crop influenced positively all analyzed parameters of the lettuce compared with previous eggplant crop. The previous melon crop reached the highest marketable yield with an increase of 59% compared with previous eggplant crop. Compared to the mineral fertilizer, the organic ones significantly increased the extracted fraction of soil organic carbon (6.9, 10.7 and 14.9% for OM, AD and MSW, respectively), without significant changes for the humic and fulvic content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Head average weight, leaf area index, nitrate content and SPAD readings did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments during cropping cycles.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
Head average weight, leaf area index, nitrate content and SPAD readingse0
Direction
did not show significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Head average weight, leaf area index, nitrate content and SPAD readings during the cropping cycles did not show significant differences among fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average marketable yield under AD and MSW decreased 16% relative to OM.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
AD and MSW treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16e0
Comparator
OM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average marketable yield and head average weight of organic fertilizers experimental (AD and MSW treatments) decreased of 16 and 17%, respectively, compared to OM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average head weight under AD and MSW decreased 17% relative to OM.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
AD and MSW treatmentse0
Outcome
head average weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
OM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average marketable yield and head average weight of organic fertilizers experimental (AD and MSW treatments) decreased of 16 and 17%, respectively, compared to OM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous melon improved all analyzed lettuce parameters relative to previous eggplant.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
previous melon crope0
Outcome
all analyzed parameters of the lettucee0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
previous eggplant crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The previous melon crop influenced positively all analyzed parameters of the lettuce compared with previous eggplant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous melon increased lettuce marketable yield by 59% compared with previous eggplant.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
previous melon crope0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
59%e0
Comparator
previous eggplant crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The previous melon crop reached the highest marketable yield with an increase of 59% compared with previous eggplant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1622 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OM increased extracted soil organic carbon by 6.9% against mineral fertilizer.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
OMe0
Outcome
extracted fraction of soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.9e0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the mineral fertilizer, the organic ones significantly increased the extracted fraction of soil organic carbon (6.9, 10.7 and 14.9% for OM, AD and MSW, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AD increased extracted soil organic carbon by 10.7% against mineral fertilizer.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
ADe0
Outcome
extracted fraction of soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.7e0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the mineral fertilizer, the organic ones significantly increased the extracted fraction of soil organic carbon (6.9, 10.7 and 14.9% for OM, AD and MSW, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MSW increased extracted soil organic carbon by 14.9% against mineral fertilizer.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
MSWe0
Outcome
extracted fraction of soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.9%e0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the mineral fertilizer, the organic ones significantly increased the extracted fraction of soil organic carbon (6.9, 10.7 and 14.9% for OM, AD and MSW, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers did not significantly change soil humic and fulvic content.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
organic onese0
Outcome
humic and fulvic contente0
Direction
without significant changese0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the mineral fertilizer, the organic ones significantly increased the extracted fraction of soil organic carbon (6.9, 10.7 and 14.9% for OM, AD and MSW, respectively), without significant changes for the humic and fulvic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.