Paper · 2009 · International Journal of Pest Management

Effect of leaf pruning at flower emergence of banana plants (MusaAAA) on fruit yield and black Sigatoka (Mycosphaerella fijiensis) disease

A. Vargas; M. Araya; M. Guzmán; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of banana (Musa AAA) leaf pruning intensities at flower emergence on fruit yield and black Sigatoka leaf infection. In both experiments a decreasing linear effect of leaf pruning intensities was observed on the number of functional and total leaves of the parental plant at harvest. Leaf pruning intensities did not affect bunch weight and fruit length in any experiment. As leaf pruning intensity increased there was a significant rectilinear increase in the flowering index in the first, second and third flowering ratoon crops. In the plant crop experiment black Sigatoka variables were not affected by leaf pruning. However, in the ratoon crops experiment, as leaf removal increased, black Sigatoka severity decreased at 4 and 8 weeks, and was similar at 11 weeks after flower emergence. The results support leaf pruning at flower emergence as a tool for inclusion in the integrated management of black Sigatoka severity, because there was either no reduction in bunch weight or any change in ratooning times. Keywords: black Sigatokadeleafingdefoliation Musa AAAyield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing pruning intensity linearly reduced functional parental leaves at harvest.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
parental plant at harveste0
Treatment
leaf pruning intensitiese0
Outcome
number of functionale0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both experiments a decreasing linear effect of leaf pruning intensities was observed on the number of functional and total leaves of the parental plant at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing pruning intensity linearly reduced total parental leaves at harvest.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
parental plant at harveste0
Treatment
leaf pruning intensitiese0
Outcome
total leavese0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both experiments a decreasing linear effect of leaf pruning intensities was observed on the number of functional and total leaves of the parental plant at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning intensity did not affect bunch weight in either experiment.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Leaf pruning intensitiese0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf pruning intensities did not affect bunch weight and fruit length in any experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning intensity did not affect fruit length in either experiment.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Leaf pruning intensitiese0
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf pruning intensities did not affect bunch weight and fruit length in any experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing pruning intensity significantly increased the flowering index in the first ratoon crop.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf pruning intensitye0
Outcome
flowering indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
firste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“As leaf pruning intensity increased there was a significant rectilinear increase in the flowering index in the first, second and third flowering ratoon crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing pruning intensity significantly increased the flowering index in the second ratoon crop.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf pruning intensitye0
Outcome
flowering indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“As leaf pruning intensity increased there was a significant rectilinear increase in the flowering index in the first, second and third flowering ratoon crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing pruning intensity significantly increased the flowering index in the third ratoon crop.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf pruning intensitye0
Outcome
flowering indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
third flowering ratoon cropse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“As leaf pruning intensity increased there was a significant rectilinear increase in the flowering index in the first, second and third flowering ratoon crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning did not affect black Sigatoka variables in the plant crop.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf pruninge0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella fijiensisPseudocercospora fijiensist1pathogen
Outcome
black Sigatoka variablese0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
plant crop experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Pseudocercospora fijiensis · InteractorScot Nelson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mycosphaerella fijiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the plant crop experiment black Sigatoka variables were not affected by leaf pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater leaf removal decreased black Sigatoka severity at four weeks after flower emergence in ratoon crops.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf removale0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella fijiensisPseudocercospora fijiensist1pathogen
Outcome
black Sigatoka severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Pseudocercospora fijiensis · InteractorScot Nelson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mycosphaerella fijiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“as leaf removal increased, black Sigatoka severity decreased at 4 and 8 weeks, and was similar at 11 weeks after flower emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater leaf removal decreased black Sigatoka severity at eight weeks after flower emergence in ratoon crops.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf removale0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella fijiensisPseudocercospora fijiensist1pathogen
Outcome
black Sigatoka severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
8 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Pseudocercospora fijiensis · InteractorScot Nelson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mycosphaerella fijiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“as leaf removal increased, black Sigatoka severity decreased at 4 and 8 weeks, and was similar at 11 weeks after flower emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black Sigatoka severity was similar across leaf removal intensities at eleven weeks after flower emergence.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
leaf removale0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella fijiensisPseudocercospora fijiensist1pathogen
Outcome
black Sigatoka severitye0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
11 weeks after flower emergencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Pseudocercospora fijiensis · InteractorScot Nelson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mycosphaerella fijiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“as leaf removal increased, black Sigatoka severity decreased at 4 and 8 weeks, and was similar at 11 weeks after flower emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–854 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend pruning at flower emergence as part of integrated black Sigatoka management.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella fijiensisPseudocercospora fijiensist1pathogen
Outcome
leaf pruning at flower emergence as a tool for inclusion in the integrated management of black Sigatoka severitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Pseudocercospora fijiensis · InteractorScot Nelson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Mycosphaerella fijiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results support leaf pruning at flower emergence as a tool for inclusion in the integrated management of black Sigatoka severity, because there was either no reduction in bunch weight or any change in ratooning times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1076 · show in text ↑

pruning · Pseudocercospora fijiensis · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.