Paper · 2013 · Acta Agrobotanica

Plants sensitivity on nickel under different conditions of iron or calcium concentration in the nutrient medium

Renata Matraszek

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The sensitivity of six vegetable plants on nickel at early stages of their growth was investigated by index of tolerance. Besides the possibility of nickel fitostabilization by additional application of iron or calcium was tested. The experiment was conducted on Petri dishes. Different concentrations of nickel (0; 0,03; 0,06mM Ni as nickel sulphate), iron (0,05; O,OlmM Fe as Fe2+ citrate) and calcium (0,50; 0,75; lmM Ca as calcium carbonate) were added. Taking into consideration the sensitivity, investigated vegetables can be ordered in the following way: Cucurbita pepo conv. giromontiina L.>Lactuca sativa L.>Sinapis alba L.>Spinacia oleracea L.=Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke.>Phaseolus vulgaris L. Positive, statistically significant effect ofnickel fitostabilization (0,03 or 0,06mM Ni) on elongative growth by the iron application (0,10mM Fe) was shown for Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke independently of Ni concentration in the nutrient medium as well as for Sinapis alba L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. in 0,06mM Ni. Addition as much as 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,03mM Ni had positive result on Sinapis alba L and Phaseolus vulgaris L. seedlings as well as on Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke and Lactuca sativa L. roots and Cucurbita pepo convar. giromontiina L. shoots. Addition of 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,06mM Ni promoted elongative growth of Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke seedlings. Application lmM Ca resulted in the promotion of elongative growth of Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke. roots (0,03mM Ni) as well as Spinacia oleracea L. roots (0,06mM Ni).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitivity to nickel ranked Cucurbita pepo > Lactuca sativa > Sinapis alba > Spinacia oleracea = Zea mays > Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
six vegetable plantse0
Outcome
sensitivitye0
Qualifier
Cucurbita pepo conv. giromontiina L.>Lactuca sativa L.>Sinapis alba L.>Spinacia oleracea L.=Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke.>Phaseolus vulgaris L.e1

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitivity of six vegetable plants on nickel at early stages of their growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucurbita pepo conv. giromontiina L.>Lactuca sativa L.>Sinapis alba L.>Spinacia oleracea L.=Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke.>Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application (0.10 mM Fe) had a positive, statistically significant effect on elongative growth of sweet corn (Zea mays var. saccharata) irrespective of Ni concentration.

Taxon
Zea mays var. saccharata KckeZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment
iron application (0,10mM Fe)e0
Outcome
elongative growthe0
Direction
Positivee0
Qualifier
independently of Ni concentration in the nutrient mediume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive, statistically significant effect ofnickel fitostabilization (0,03 or 0,06mM Ni) on elongative growth by the iron application (0,10mM Fe) was shown for Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke independently of Ni concentration in the nutrient medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application (0.10 mM Fe) had a positive, statistically significant effect on elongative growth of Sinapis alba at 0.06 mM Ni.

Taxon
Sinapis alba L.Sinapis albae1
Treatment
iron application (0,10mM Fe)e0
Outcome
elongative growthe0
Direction
Positivee0
Qualifier
in 0,06mM Nie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive, statistically significant effect ofnickel fitostabilization (0,03 or 0,06mM Ni) on elongative growth by the iron application (0,10mM Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“as well as for Sinapis alba L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. in 0,06mM Ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application (0.10 mM Fe) had a positive, statistically significant effect on elongative growth of Phaseolus vulgaris at 0.06 mM Ni.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
iron application (0,10mM Fe)e0
Outcome
elongative growthe0
Direction
Positivee0
Qualifier
in 0,06mM Nie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive, statistically significant effect ofnickel fitostabilization (0,03 or 0,06mM Ni) on elongative growth by the iron application (0,10mM Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“as well as for Sinapis alba L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. in 0,06mM Ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.75 mM Ca in the presence of 0.03 mM Ni had a positive result on Sinapis alba seedlings.

Taxon
Sinapis alba LSinapis albae1
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
Addition as much as 0,75mM Cae0
Outcome
positive resulte0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
in the presence 0,03mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition as much as 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,03mM Ni had positive result on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sinapis alba L and Phaseolus vulgaris L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.75 mM Ca in the presence of 0.03 mM Ni had a positive result on Phaseolus vulgaris seedlings.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
Addition as much as 0,75mM Cae0
Outcome
positive resulte0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
in the presence 0,03mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition as much as 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,03mM Ni had positive result on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sinapis alba L and Phaseolus vulgaris L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.75 mM Ca in the presence of 0.03 mM Ni had a positive result on Zea mays var. saccharata roots.

Taxon
Zea mays var. saccharata KckeZea mays subsp. mayse1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Addition as much as 0,75mM Cae0
Outcome
positive resulte0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
in the presence 0,03mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition as much as 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,03mM Ni had positive result on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke and Lactuca sativa L. roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.75 mM Ca in the presence of 0.03 mM Ni had a positive result on Lactuca sativa roots.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativae1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Addition as much as 0,75mM Cae0
Outcome
positive resulte0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
in the presence 0,03mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition as much as 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,03mM Ni had positive result on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke and Lactuca sativa L. roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.75 mM Ca in the presence of 0.03 mM Ni had a positive result on Cucurbita pepo shoots.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepo convar. giromontiina L.Cucurbita pepoe1
Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
Addition as much as 0,75mM Cae0
Outcome
positive resulte0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
in the presence 0,03mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition as much as 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,03mM Ni had positive result on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cucurbita pepo convar. giromontiina L. shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.75 mM Ca in the presence of 0.06 mM Ni promoted elongative growth of Zea mays var. saccharata seedlings.

Taxon
Zea mays var. saccharata KckeZea mays subsp. mayse0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
Addition of 0,75mM Cae0
Outcome
elongative growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
in the presence 0,06mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 0,75mM Ca in the presence 0,06mM Ni promoted elongative growth of Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 1 mM Ca promoted elongative growth of Zea mays var. saccharata roots at 0.03 mM Ni.

Taxon
Zea mays var. saccharata KckeZea mays subsp. mayse0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Application lmM Cae0
Outcome
elongative growthe0
Direction
promotione0
Qualifier
0,03mM Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application lmM Ca resulted in the promotion of elongative growth of Zea mays var. saccharata Kcke. roots (0,03mM Ni)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 1 mM Ca promoted elongative growth of Spinacia oleracea roots at 0.06 mM Ni.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceae1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Application lmM Cae0
Outcome
elongative growthe0
Direction
promotione0
Qualifier
0,06mM Nie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application lmM Ca resulted in the promotion of elongative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1463 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spinacia oleracea L. roots (0,06mM Ni)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1565 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

iron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

iron atom · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.