Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

EFFECT OF EARLY GROWING SEASON MOISTURE STRESS ON BARLEY UTILIZATION OF BROADCAST-INCORPORATED AND DEEP-BANDED UREA

M. D. HARTMAN; M. NYBORG

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to examine the interaction of fertilizer placement and moisture level on barley (Hordeum vulgare 'Gait') utilization of urea-N during early growth. The 15 N labelled urea (50 kg ha −1 ) was either deep-banded or broadcast-incorporated, and plant samples were taken from the two-leaf stage until anthesis, then again at maturity. Five moisture regimes were created using rain shelters, with 0, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm water applied per week until anthesis. A natural precipitation treatment was also included. All barley plants were unsheltered from anthesis to maturity. Weekly fertilizer recoveries by the crop with no water additions were much less for broadcast-incorporated N than deep placement. The differences narrowed with increasing rates of water additions. Apparently, broadcast-incorporated fertilizer N remained in dry surface layers of the no-water treatment, and was positionally unavailable for absorption by the crop. Compared to deep-banded N, broadcast-incorporated N resulted in 37% less grain when drought stress occurred from seeding to anthesis. Broadcast-incorporated N was more susceptible to immobilization by the soil than was deep-banded N. Key words: Barley, drought stress, 15 N-urea, fertilizer positional unavailability, N immobilization

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without water additions, weekly fertilizer recovery by the barley crop was much lower with broadcast-incorporated N than with deep placement.

Treatment
broadcast-incorporated Ne0
Outcome
fertilizer recoveries by the crope0
Direction
much lesse0
Qualifier
with no water additionse0
Comparator
deep placemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weekly fertilizer recoveries by the crop with no water additions were much less for broadcast-incorporated N than deep placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought from seeding to anthesis, broadcast-incorporated N gave 37% less grain than deep-banded N.

Treatment
broadcast-incorporated Ne2
Outcome
graine2
Direction
lesse2
Value
37%e2
Qualifier
when drought stress occurred from seeding to anthesise2
Comparator
deep-banded Ne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to deep-banded N, broadcast-incorporated N resulted in 37% less grain when drought stress occurred from seeding to anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1097 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast-incorporated N was more susceptible to soil immobilization than deep-banded N.

Treatment
broadcast-incorporated Ne3
Outcome
immobilization by the soile3
Direction
more susceptiblee3
Comparator
deep-banded Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“Broadcast-incorporated N was more susceptible to immobilization by the soil than was deep-banded N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1197 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast-incorporated N apparently remained in dry surface layers in the no-water treatment and was therefore unavailable for crop absorption.

Outcome
absorption by the crope4
Qualifier
remained in dry surface layers of the no-water treatmente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e4

“Apparently, broadcast-incorporated fertilizer N remained in dry surface layers of the no-water treatment, and was positionally unavailable for absorption by the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–963 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The differences between placements narrowed as water additions increased.

Treatment
increasing rates of water additionse1
Outcome
differencese1
Direction
narrowede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“The differences narrowed with increasing rates of water additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–796 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.