Paper · 2013 · Agronomy Journal

Integrating Cultural and Mechanical Methods for Additive Weed Control in Organic Systems

Dilshan Benaragama; Steven J. Shirtliffe

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effective weed management strategies are limited in organic cropping systems because herbicide use is prohibited. Enhancing crop competitive ability by integrating both cultural and mechanical weed control methods is a key strategy in such instances, but the relative efficacy of different cultural and mechanical strategies and their interactions and additive effects when combined is not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the individual and additive effects of cultural and mechanical methods on weed suppression and crop yield under organic conditions. A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009. Three cultural practices, two crop genotypes (competitive and less competitive), high and standard crop densities (500 and 250 plants m –2 ), narrow and standard row spacings (11.5 and 23 cm), and two post‐emergence tillage levels (harrowing and nonharrowed control) were factorially applied in a randomized block design. Increasing crop density and harrowing increased grain yield by 11 and 13%, respectively. Competitive genotype and high crop density reduced weed biomass by 22 and 52%, respectively. Combining high crop density with post‐emergence harrowing increased the grain yield by 25%. The combined treatment effects on weed biomass were more profound, as the competitive genotype, increased seeding rate, and post‐emergence harrowing decreased weed biomass by 71% compared with standard practices. Integrating cultural and mechanical weed management practices was superior to the use of individual practices because they additively control weeds in an organic cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing crop density increased oat grain yield by 11% relative to standard crop density.

Treatment
Increasing crop densitye1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11e1
Comparator
standard crop densitiese3
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing crop density and harrowing increased grain yield by 11 and 13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1121 · show in text ↑
e3

“high and standard crop densities (500 and 250 plants m –2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harrowing increased oat grain yield by 13% relative to the nonharrowed control.

Treatment
harrowinge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13%e1
Comparator
nonharrowed controle2
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing crop density and harrowing increased grain yield by 11 and 13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“two post‐emergence tillage levels (harrowing and nonharrowed control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining high crop density with post‐emergence harrowing increased oat grain yield by 25%.

Treatment
Combining high crop density with post‐emergence harrowinge4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
25%e4
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e4

“Combining high crop density with post‐emergence harrowing increased the grain yield by 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The competitive oat genotype reduced weed biomass by 22% relative to the less competitive genotype.

Material
competitivee6
Treatment
competitive genotypee5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed biomasse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
22e5
Comparator
less competitivee6
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e5

“Competitive genotype and high crop density reduced weed biomass by 22 and 52%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1214 · show in text ↑
e6

“two crop genotypes (competitive and less competitive)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High crop density reduced weed biomass by 52%.

Treatment
high crop densitye5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed biomasse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
52%e5
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e5

“Competitive genotype and high crop density reduced weed biomass by 22 and 52%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive genotype, increased seeding rate and post‐emergence harrowing together decreased weed biomass by 71% compared with standard practices.

Treatment
competitive genotype, increased seeding rate, and post‐emergence harrowinge7
Interactor
weede7weed
Outcome
weed biomasse7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
71%e7
Comparator
standard practicese7
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e7

“as the competitive genotype, increased seeding rate, and post‐emergence harrowing decreased weed biomass by 71% compared with standard practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated cultural and mechanical weed management was superior to individual practices in controlling weeds.

Treatment
Integrating cultural and mechanical weed management practicese6
Outcome
control weedse7
Direction
superiore6
Comparator
use of individual practicese6
Setting
Saskatoon, SK, Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study was performed in two organically managed oat ( Avena sativa L.) cropping systems in Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–710 · show in text ↑
e6

“Integrating cultural and mechanical weed management practices was superior to the use of individual practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1630 · show in text ↑
e7

“they additively control weeds in an organic cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1698 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

density · weed · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.