Abstract
Bacteria belonging to the genus Bacillus can promote plant growth and suppress plant-parasitic nematode populations. Based on this hypothesis, eight strains of the bacterium (SF 262, SF 264, SF 266, SF 267, SF 268, SF 271, SF 292 and SF 629) were formulated and applied as a seed treatment and/or sprayed on the soil surface with the aim of controlling Pratylenchys brachyurus in common bean under field conditions. The application of the bacterial isolates neither improved the grain yield and the root mass nor reduced the number of nematodes in the soil and in the roots of common bean. Thus none of the isolates of Bacillus spp. evaluated in this work are promising for the control of the lesion nematode on common bean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial isolates did not improve grain yield of common bean.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise0 - Treatment
- application of the bacterial isolatese0
- Interactor
- bacterial isolatese0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- neither improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of the bacterial isolates neither improved the grain yield and the root mass nor reduced the number of nematodes in the soil and in the roots of common bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial isolates did not improve common bean root mass.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of the bacterial isolatese0
- Interactor
- bacterial isolatese0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root masse0
- Direction
- neither improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of the bacterial isolates neither improved the grain yield and the root mass nor reduced the number of nematodes in the soil and in the roots of common bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial isolates did not reduce nematode numbers in soil.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of the bacterial isolatese0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchys brachyuruse1pathogen
- Outcome
- number of nematodes in the soile0
- Direction
- nor reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of the bacterial isolates neither improved the grain yield and the root mass nor reduced the number of nematodes in the soil and in the roots of common bean”
e1“Pratylenchys brachyurus in common bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial isolates did not reduce nematode numbers in common bean roots.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of the bacterial isolatese0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchys brachyuruse1pathogen
- Outcome
- number of nematodes in the soil and in the rootse0
- Direction
- nor reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of the bacterial isolates neither improved the grain yield and the root mass nor reduced the number of nematodes in the soil and in the roots of common bean”
e1“Pratylenchys brachyurus in common bean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude none of the tested Bacillus isolates are promising for lesion nematode control on common bean.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Interactor
- lesion nematodee0pathogen
- Outcome
- control of the lesion nematodee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“none of the isolates of Bacillus spp. evaluated in this work are promising for the control of the lesion nematode on common bean”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · pest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.