Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Botany

Embryo Rescue Culture Medium for Improved Synthesis of 4x Wheat × Rye Hybrids

CH Balatero; NL Darvey

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The cross-incompatibility barrier between 4x wheat and rye has limited the genetic base for triticale breeding. Experiments designed to improve the synthesis of wheat-rye amphihaploids were conducted. The effects of 2,4-D on crossability and 3x hybrid embryo differentiation, and the influence of one-step and two-step media on the culture of immature 3x embryos in vitro, were investigated. Application of 10 mg L-1 2,4-D slightly improved seed set but significantly reduced the frequency of normal embryos. In contrast to the reported favourable effect of 2,4-D on haploid embryo formation in wheat × maize crosses, the application of 2,4-D in the present study offers no real advantage on amphihaploid embryo formation from 4x wheat × rye crosses. For small and immature wheat-rye hybrid (3x) embryos, optimum recovery in vitro was obtained via a two-step procedure consisting of a semi-solid MN medium followed by MS medium supplemented with IAA (1 mg L-1) and BAP (1 mg L-1). For bigger and well-differentiated embryos, the use of a one-step Gamborg's B5 medium was sufficient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mg L-1 2,4-D slightly improved seed set.

Treatment
10 mg L-1 2,4-De0
Outcome
seed sete0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10 mg L-1 2,4-D slightly improved seed set but significantly reduced the frequency of normal embryos.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mg L-1 2,4-D significantly reduced normal embryo frequency.

Treatment
10 mg L-1 2,4-De0
Outcome
frequency of normal embryose0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 10 mg L-1 2,4-D slightly improved seed set but significantly reduced the frequency of normal embryos.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D conferred no real advantage for amphihaploid embryo formation.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
amphihaploid embryo formatione0
Direction
no real advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 2,4-D in the present study offers no real advantage on amphihaploid embryo formation from 4x wheat × rye crosses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-step MN then MS medium with IAA and BAP gave optimum recovery of small immature hybrid embryos.

Organ / stage
small and immature wheat-rye hybrid (3x) embryose0
Treatment
a two-step procedure consisting of a semi-solid MN medium followed by MS medium supplemented with IAA (1 mg L-1) and BAP (1 mg L-1)e0
Outcome
recovery in vitroe0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For small and immature wheat-rye hybrid (3x) embryos, optimum recovery in vitro was obtained via a two-step procedure consisting of a semi-solid MN medium followed by MS medium supplemented with IAA (1 mg L-1) and BAP (1 mg L-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-step Gamborg B5 medium sufficed for larger differentiated embryos.

Organ / stage
bigger and well-differentiated embryose0
Treatment
one-step Gamborg's B5 mediume0
Outcome
sufficiente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For bigger and well-differentiated embryos, the use of a one-step Gamborg's B5 medium was sufficient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.