Paper · 1974 · Agronomy Journal

Residual Effects of Crop Rotations on Water Intake, Soil Loss, and Sorghum Yield1

John E. Adams

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The duration of the residual effects of crop rotations on the fertility and physical condition of montmorillonitic clay soil is not well established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the residual effects of three crop rotations on water intake, soil loss, soil organic matter, and crop yield during five growing seasons of continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil. Water intake and soil loss were evaluated in the laboratory by the application of water drops at the rate of 10.2 cm/hour from a height of 1 m to the surface of undisturbed soil cores. Oats ( Avena sativa L.)‐grain sorghum and fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)‐grain sorghum rotations significantly (5% level) increased water intake and reduced soil loss for 20 months after the rotations were discontinued. The sweetclover ( Melilotus alba Desr.)‐grain sorghum rotation had no effect on soil loss but had a significant (5% level) residual effect on water intake for 8 months after rotations were discontinued. Grain sorghum rotations with either fescuegrass or sweetclover caused significantly more (5% level) water stable aggregates. However, one growing season of grain sorghum following sweetclover reduced aggregation to near that of soil in continuous grain sorghum. There was no significant change in aggregation in fescuegrass rotation plots after 20 months. Most of the organic matter accumulated in 10 growing seasons of a sweetclover‐grain sorghum rotation was lost after 5 growing seasons of continuous grain sorghum. Soil organic matter in former grain sorghum rotations with fescuegrass or oats showed no significant change after 5 years of continuous forage sorghum. Grain sorghum yield was significantly greater (5% level) for four growing seasons on the former sweetclover‐grain sorghum plots than on the continuous grain sorghum plots. Nitrogen fertilizer had a significant (5% level) residual effect on continuous grain sorghum yield for 2 years. The residual effects of previous crop rotations can significantly affect (5% level) water intake and soil loss for 20 months and crop yield for 1 to 4 years after rotations are discontinued. Growing sorghum continuously for 5 years reduced water intake significantly and caused a continuous slow decrease in soil organic matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats-grain sorghum rotation increased water intake for 20 months after rotations were discontinued.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Oats ( Avena sativa L.)e1
Outcome
water intakee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
for 20 months after the rotations were discontinuede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oats ( Avena sativa L.)‐grain sorghum and fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)‐grain sorghum rotations significantly (5% level) increased water intake and reduced soil loss for 20 months after the rotations were discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats-grain sorghum rotation reduced soil loss for 20 months after rotations were discontinued.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Oats ( Avena sativa L.)e1
Outcome
soil losse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
for 20 months after the rotations were discontinuede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oats ( Avena sativa L.)‐grain sorghum and fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)‐grain sorghum rotations significantly (5% level) increased water intake and reduced soil loss for 20 months after the rotations were discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fescuegrass-grain sorghum rotation increased water intake for 20 months after rotations were discontinued.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)e1
Outcome
water intakee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
for 20 months after the rotations were discontinuede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oats ( Avena sativa L.)‐grain sorghum and fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)‐grain sorghum rotations significantly (5% level) increased water intake and reduced soil loss for 20 months after the rotations were discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fescuegrass-grain sorghum rotation reduced soil loss for 20 months after rotations were discontinued.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)e1
Outcome
soil losse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
for 20 months after the rotations were discontinuede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oats ( Avena sativa L.)‐grain sorghum and fescuegrass ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)‐grain sorghum rotations significantly (5% level) increased water intake and reduced soil loss for 20 months after the rotations were discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetclover-grain sorghum rotation had no effect on soil loss.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
sweetclover ( Melilotus alba Desr.)e2
Outcome
soil losse2
Direction
had no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e2

“The sweetclover ( Melilotus alba Desr.)‐grain sorghum rotation had no effect on soil loss but had a significant (5% level) residual effect on water intake for 8 months after rotations were discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetclover-grain sorghum rotation had a significant residual effect on water intake for 8 months after rotations were discontinued.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
sweetclover ( Melilotus alba Desr.)e2
Outcome
water intakee2
Qualifier
for 8 months after rotations were discontinuede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e2

“The sweetclover ( Melilotus alba Desr.)‐grain sorghum rotation had no effect on soil loss but had a significant (5% level) residual effect on water intake for 8 months after rotations were discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain sorghum rotations with fescuegrass or sweetclover caused significantly more water stable aggregates.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
rotations with either fescuegrass or sweetclovere3
Outcome
water stable aggregatese3
Direction
moree3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain sorghum rotations with either fescuegrass or sweetclover caused significantly more (5% level) water stable aggregates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One growing season of grain sorghum following sweetclover reduced aggregation to near that of continuous grain sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
one growing season of grain sorghum following sweetclovere4
Outcome
aggregatione4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
continuous grain sorghume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e4

“one growing season of grain sorghum following sweetclover reduced aggregation to near that of soil in continuous grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fescuegrass rotation caused no significant change in aggregation after 20 months.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
fescuegrass rotation plotse5
Outcome
aggregatione5
Direction
no significant changee5
Qualifier
after 20 monthse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant change in aggregation in fescuegrass rotation plots after 20 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most organic matter accumulated under sweetclover-grain sorghum rotation was lost after 5 seasons of continuous grain sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
5 growing seasons of continuous grain sorghume6
Outcome
organic mattere6
Direction
was loste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e6

“Most of the organic matter accumulated in 10 growing seasons of a sweetclover‐grain sorghum rotation was lost after 5 growing seasons of continuous grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter in former rotations with fescuegrass or oats showed no significant change after 5 years of continuous grain sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
continuous forage sorghume7
Outcome
Soil organic mattere7
Direction
no significant changee7
Qualifier
after 5 yearse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil organic matter in former grain sorghum rotations with fescuegrass or oats showed no significant change after 5 years of continuous forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain sorghum yield was significantly greater for four seasons on former sweetclover plots than on continuous grain sorghum plots.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
former sweetclovere1
Outcome
Grain sorghum yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
for four growing seasonse1
Comparator
continuous grain sorghum plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain sorghum yield was significantly greater (5% level) for four growing seasons on the former sweetclover‐grain sorghum plots than on the continuous grain sorghum plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer had a significant residual effect on continuous grain sorghum yield for 2 years.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
continuous grain sorghum yielde1
Qualifier
for 2 yearse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertilizer had a significant (5% level) residual effect on continuous grain sorghum yield for 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–2004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing sorghum continuously for 5 years reduced water intake significantly.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Growing sorghum continuously for 5 yearse1
Outcome
water intakee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growing sorghum continuously for 5 years reduced water intake significantly and caused a continuous slow decrease in soil organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2197–2333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing sorghum continuously for 5 years caused a continuous slow decrease in soil organic matter.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Growing sorghum continuously for 5 yearse1
Outcome
soil organic mattere1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
continuous slowe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown on Houston Black clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growing sorghum continuously for 5 years reduced water intake significantly and caused a continuous slow decrease in soil organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2197–2333 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · soil: chemistry · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.