Paper · 2015 · Crop and Pasture Science

Performance of spring cereal genotypes under defoliation on the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia

R. A. Latta

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In mixed cropping and livestock dryland farming systems in southern Australia, grazing of cereals during their vegetative growth stages (typically during winter) can provide a valuable contribution of high-quality feed during a period of low pasture growth. This paper reports results from a series of experiments investigating the impact of defoliation on the grain production of cereals in the Eyre Peninsula region of South Australia. The comparative dry matter production and grain yield of wheat, barley and oats cultivars, with and without defoliation, at a range of growth stages were measured in four experiments over three growing seasons, two of which were water-deficient. The barley varieties evaluated produced up to twice the dry matter of the wheat or oats cultivars to the time of defoliation. Mowing following stem elongation more than halved grain yield (1.9 to 0.9 t ha–1) relative to no defoliation in an early-maturing variety, but with less reduction in later maturing varieties. Defoliation before stem elongation in two seasons of very low growing-season rainfall (<100 mm) caused no or very little loss in grain yields, which were generally <1 t ha–1. A long-season winter wheat produced similar grain yields irrespective of defoliation and timing, but with no yield advantage over the defoliated spring cereals. The results suggest opportunities to incorporate the grazing of cereals to fill a winter feed-gap in the low-rainfall zone of southern Australia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley varieties produced up to twice the dry matter of wheat or oats cultivars before defoliation.

Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
up to twicee0
Value
up to twicee0
Comparator
wheat or oats cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The barley varieties evaluated produced up to twice the dry matter of the wheat or oats cultivars to the time of defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing after stem elongation more than halved early maturing grain yield relative to no defoliation.

Taxon
cerealse1
Material
early-maturing varietye0
Treatment
Mowing following stem elongatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
more than halvede0
Value
1.9 to 0.9 t ha–1e0
Comparator
no defoliatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Mowing following stem elongation more than halved grain yield (1.9 to 0.9 t ha–1) relative to no defoliation in an early-maturing variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring cereal genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“but with no yield advantage over the defoliated spring cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later maturing varieties had less grain yield loss from mowing after stem elongation.

Taxon
cerealse1
Material
later maturing varietiese0
Treatment
Mowing following stem elongatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
less reductione0
Comparator
early-maturing varietye2

Verbatim

e0

“but with less reduction in later maturing varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring cereal genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“but with no yield advantage over the defoliated spring cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1336 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mowing following stem elongation more than halved grain yield (1.9 to 0.9 t ha–1) relative to no defoliation in an early-maturing variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation before stem elongation caused little or no grain yield loss during two very dry seasons.

Taxon
cerealse1
Treatment
Defoliation before stem elongatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
no or very little losse0
Value
<1 t ha–1e0
Qualifier
very low growing-season rainfall (<100 mm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation before stem elongation in two seasons of very low growing-season rainfall (<100 mm) caused no or very little loss in grain yields, which were generally <1 t ha–1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring cereal genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“but with no yield advantage over the defoliated spring cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-season winter wheat grain yield was similar across defoliation timings.

Material
long-season winter wheate0
Treatment
defoliation and timinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A long-season winter wheat produced similar grain yields irrespective of defoliation and timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1272 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat had no yield advantage over defoliated spring cereals.

Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
no yield advantagee0
Comparator
defoliated spring cerealse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but with no yield advantage over the defoliated spring cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1336 · show in text ↑
e1

“A long-season winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1203 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest grazing cereals for winter feed in the low rainfall zone.

Taxon
cerealse0
Outcome
grazing of cereals to fill a winter feed-gape0
Setting
southern Australiae0

Verbatim

e0

“opportunities to incorporate the grazing of cereals to fill a winter feed-gap in the low-rainfall zone of southern Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1482 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 33 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.