Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Root Characteristics of Corn Genotypes as Related to P Uptake1

M. K. Schenk; S. A. Barber

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
151
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plant utilization of P applied to soils is usually low. Utilization may be increased by having more roots present or by improving P uptake characteristics of the roots. The objective of this research was to determine the effect of varying corn ( Zea mays L.) root characteristics, by using different genotypes, on P uptake and to determine if the Claassen‐Barber simulation model predicted these differences accurately. Five corn genotypes were grown in the growth chamber in soil at two levels of P and harvested a three ages. Increasing P level increased shoot yield of all genotypes, but had little effect on the amount of roots. The root surface area per unit of shoot weight varied between genotypes at low soil P but not at high soil P. Wih high soil P here was a linear correlation with r = 0.98 and a slope of 0.97 between P uptake predicted by the simulation model and observed P uptake. At low soil P observed P uptake was double the predicted uptake, however, the correlation was r = 0.90. Root hair effects, not included in the simulation model, were probably the reason for the greater observed P uptake at low soil P. Differences between genotype in morphological and physiological root characteristics in. fluenced the amount of P absorbed by corn plants. It appears that genotypes could be developed that would be more efficient in absorbing P from soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil P increased shoot yield in all corn genotypes.

Treatment
Increasing P levele0
Outcome
shoot yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing P level increased shoot yield of all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil P had little effect on root amount.

Treatment
P levele1
Outcome
amount of rootse0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had little effect on the amount of roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing P level increased shoot yield of all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–594 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root surface area per shoot weight varied among genotypes at low P but not high P.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
root surface area per unit of shoot weighte0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
at low soil P but not at high soil Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root surface area per unit of shoot weight varied between genotypes at low soil P but not at high soil P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high P, predicted and observed uptake were linearly correlated with r = 0.98.

Outcome
P uptake predicted by the simulation model and observed P uptakee0
Value
r = 0.98e0
Qualifier
a slope of 0.97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wih high soil P here was a linear correlation with r = 0.98 and a slope of 0.97 between P uptake predicted by the simulation model and observed P uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low soil P, observed uptake was double predicted uptake.

Outcome
observed P uptakee0
Direction
doublee0
Value
r = 0.90e0
Comparator
predicted uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At low soil P observed P uptake was double the predicted uptake, however, the correlation was r = 0.90.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root hairs probably explain underprediction of uptake at low P.

Organ / stage
Root haire0
Outcome
greater observed P uptakee0
Qualifier
at low soil Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root hair effects, not included in the simulation model, were probably the reason for the greater observed P uptake at low soil P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic root morphology and physiology influenced corn P absorption.

Material
genotypee0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
amount of P absorbede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between genotype in morphological and physiological root characteristics in. fluenced the amount of P absorbed by corn plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1279 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider development of more efficient P-absorbing genotypes feasible.

Outcome
genotypes could be developed that would be more efficient in absorbing P from soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It appears that genotypes could be developed that would be more efficient in absorbing P from soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.