Paper · 2008 · Physiologia Plantarum

Chilling stress response of postemergent cotton seedlings

Benjamin P. DeRidder; Steven J. Crafts‐Brandner

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Early season development of cotton is often impaired by sudden episodes of chilling temperature. We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings. Seedlings were gradually chilled during the dark period and rewarmed during the night-to-day transition. For some chilled plants, the soil temperature was maintained at control level. Plant growth, water relations and net photosynthesis (P(n)) were analyzed after one or three chilling cycles and after 3 days of recovery. Three chilling cycles led to lower relative growth rate (RGR) compared with controls during the recovery period, especially for plants with chilled shoots and roots. Treatment differences in RGR were associated with net assimilation rate rather than specific leaf area. Both chilling treatments led to loss of leaf turgor during the night-to-day transition; this effect was greater for plants with chilled compared with warm roots. Chilling-induced water stress was associated with accumulation of the osmolyte glycine betaine to the same extent for both chilling treatments. Inhibition of P(n) during chilling was related to both stomatal and non-stomatal effects. P(n) fully recovered after seedlings were returned to control conditions for 3 days. We conclude that leaf expansion during the night-to-day transition was a significant factor determining the magnitude of the chilling response of postemergent cotton seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three chilling cycles lowered the relative growth rate of cotton seedlings compared with controls during recovery, especially for plants with chilled shoots and roots.

Material
Coker 100A-glandlesse0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse1
Treatment
Three chilling cyclese1
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three chilling cycles led to lower relative growth rate (RGR) compared with controls during the recovery period, especially for plants with chilled shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–723 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment differences in relative growth rate of cotton seedlings were associated with net assimilation rate rather than specific leaf area.

Outcome
net assimilation ratee3
Qualifier
rather than specific leaf areae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e3

“Treatment differences in RGR were associated with net assimilation rate rather than specific leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both chilling treatments caused loss of leaf turgor in cotton seedlings during the night-to-day transition.

Treatment
chilling treatmentse2
Outcome
loss of leaf turgore2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Qualifier
during the night-to-day transitione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both chilling treatments led to loss of leaf turgor during the night-to-day transition; this effect was greater for plants with chilled compared with warm roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loss of leaf turgor in cotton seedlings was greater with chilled roots than with warm roots.

Organ / stage
rootse2
Treatment
chillede2
Outcome
loss of leaf turgore2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
warm rootse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both chilling treatments led to loss of leaf turgor during the night-to-day transition; this effect was greater for plants with chilled compared with warm roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–989 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling-induced water stress was associated with the same accumulation of glycine betaine in cotton seedlings under both chilling treatments.

Treatment
Chilling-induced water stresse4
Compound
glycine betainee4
Outcome
accumulation of the osmolyte glycine betainee4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e4

“Chilling-induced water stress was associated with accumulation of the osmolyte glycine betaine to the same extent for both chilling treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition of net photosynthesis during chilling in cotton seedlings was related to both stomatal and non-stomatal effects.

Outcome
Inhibition of P(n) during chillinge5
Qualifier
stomatal and non-stomatal effectse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e5

“Inhibition of P(n) during chilling was related to both stomatal and non-stomatal effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis of cotton seedlings fully recovered after return to control conditions for 3 days.

Outcome
P(n) fully recoverede6
Qualifier
after seedlings were returned to control conditions for 3 dayse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e6

“P(n) fully recovered after seedlings were returned to control conditions for 3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1308 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf expansion during the night-to-day transition was a factor determining the magnitude of the chilling response of cotton seedlings.

Outcome
magnitude of the chilling responsee7
Qualifier
leaf expansion during the night-to-day transitione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the chilling response specific to postemergent 13-day-old cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 100A-glandless) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–234 · show in text ↑
e7

“leaf expansion during the night-to-day transition was a significant factor determining the magnitude of the chilling response of postemergent cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1485 · show in text ↑

cold · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

cold · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.