Paper · 2008 · Breeding Science

Effects of dose and dose rate of gamma ray irradiation on mutation induction and nuclear DNA content in chrysanthemum

Hiroyasu Yamaguchi; Akemi Shimizu; Konosuke Degi; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
88
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We investigated the effect of total irradiation dose and dose rate on flower color mutation and nuclear DNA content as an index of radiation damage in chrysanthemum. Chrysanthemum morifolium cv. ‘Taihei’ plants grown by in vitro culture were gamma-irradiated with a total dose of 15, 30 and 60 Gy at a rate of 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 Gy/h. Leaf explants cut from the irradiated plants were tissue cultured, and the regeneration rates and frequency of flower color mutation were investigated. Nuclear DNA content was measured by flow cytometric analysis. The regeneration rate decreased with increase in the total dose and dose rate of irradiation. Mutation frequency did not differ significantly among dose rates, indicating that mutation frequency was independent of dose rate and was dependent mainly on total dose. Comparison of the average of the nuclear DNA content with each treatment revealed that it was influenced by both dose rate and total dose, and that the reduction in nuclear DNA content was less at low dose rates, even when total doses were high. It appears that same mutation frequencies were obtained without large reduction in nuclear DNA content by 0.5 Gy/h, when compared with 2 Gy/h. Consequently, we conclude that gamma ray irradiations of high total doses at low dose rates efficiently induce mutations with less radiation damage in chrysanthemum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration rate decreased as irradiation dose and dose rate increased.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
total dose and dose rate of irradiatione0
Outcome
regeneration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regeneration rate decreased with increase in the total dose and dose rate of irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutation frequency did not differ significantly among dose rates.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
dose ratese0
Outcome
Mutation frequencye0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mutation frequency did not differ significantly among dose rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutation frequency depended mainly on total dose.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
total dosee0
Outcome
mutation frequencye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mutation frequency was independent of dose rate and was dependent mainly on total dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nuclear DNA content was influenced by both dose rate and total dose.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
dose rate and total dosee0
Outcome
nuclear DNA contente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was influenced by both dose rate and total dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–947 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in nuclear DNA content was less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduction in nuclear DNA content was less at low dose rates even with high total doses.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
low dose ratese0
Outcome
nuclear DNA contente0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
even when total doses were highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction in nuclear DNA content was less at low dose rates, even when total doses were high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.5 Gy/h, mutation frequencies appeared similar to 2 Gy/h with less loss of nuclear DNA content.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
0.5 Gy/he0
Outcome
mutation frequenciese0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
2 Gy/he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“same mutation frequencies were obtained without large reduction in nuclear DNA content by 0.5 Gy/h, when compared with 2 Gy/h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose rate irradiation at high total doses was recommended to induce mutations with less damage.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
gamma ray irradiations of high total doses at low dose ratese0
Outcome
efficiently induce mutations with less radiation damagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gamma ray irradiations of high total doses at low dose rates efficiently induce mutations with less radiation damage in chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1363 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.