Paper · 1995 · Physiologia Plantarum

Effects of UV‐B on flavonoids, ferulic acid, growth and photosynthesis in barley primary leaves

Lan Liu; Dennis C. Gitz; Jerry W. McClure

19
claims
42
verbatim quotes
230
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) was grown with UV‐B (280–320 nm) at levels simulating 25 nr 5% ozone depletion on the date of the summer solstice al 40°N latitude, with UV‐A (320–400 nm), or with no supplemental irradiation. In plant growth chambers providing 300 μmol m −2 s −1 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). UV‐B‐grown leaves elongated more slowly than controls but reached the same final length 1 day later. Leal specific fresh weight (mass leaf area −1 ) was significantly increased by UV‐B after the 7th day of growth. IV‐B did not significantly affect leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, total chlorophylls, total carotenoids or photosynthetic quantum efficiency. CO 2 assimilation was decreased by UV‐B only at internal CO 2 levels above 250 μl l −1 . By the 8th day of growth, UV‐B increased flavonoid (saponarin and lutonarin) accumulation in both the lower epidermis and the mesophyll: about 40% of the saponarin and 20% of the lutonarin were in the lower epidermis under all experimental conditions. Glasshouse conditions proved too variable for reproducible determination of growth and photosynthesis but were reliable for determining developmental changes in flavonoid (saponarin and lutonarin) accumulation and provided up to 800 μmol m −2 s −1 PAR. In the glasshouse UV‐B‐grown leaves had more flavonoids than controls al all stages from 5 to 30 days after planting: ca 509 more saponarin and 100% more lutonarin. Levels of soluble (vacuolar) ferulic acid esters were similar under all conditions on day 5. and on day 20 or later, but were significantly higher in UV‐B‐grown plants on days 10 and 15. UV‐B decreased insoluble (cell‐wall‐bound) ferulic acid esters on a whole leaf basis but significantly increased this fraction in the lower epidermis. UV‐A had no significant effects on growth, photosynthesis or ferulic acid, but it slightly increased flavonoid accumulation. The results are discussed in terms of secondary phenolics as a tissue‐specific, developmentally regulated adaptive response to UV‐B.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B leaves elongated more slowly than controls.

Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
leaves elongatede0
Direction
more slowlye0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐B‐grown leaves elongated more slowly than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B leaves reached the same final length one day later.

Treatment
UV‐Be1
Outcome
final lengthe0
Direction
samee0
Value
1 day latere0
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reached the same final length 1 day later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV‐B‐grown leaves elongated more slowly than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B significantly increased leaf specific fresh weight after day seven.

Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
Leal specific fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after the 7th day of growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leal specific fresh weight (mass leaf area −1 ) was significantly increased by UV‐B after the 7th day of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not significantly affect leaf area, fresh weight, or dry weight.

Treatment
IV‐Be0
Outcome
leaf area, fresh weight, dry weighte0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IV‐B did not significantly affect leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not significantly affect total chlorophylls, total carotenoids, or photosynthetic quantum efficiency.

Treatment
IV‐Be0
Outcome
total chlorophylls, total carotenoids or photosynthetic quantum efficiencye0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IV‐B did not significantly affect leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, total chlorophylls, total carotenoids or photosynthetic quantum efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B decreased CO2 assimilation only above an internal CO2 threshold.

Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
only at internal CO 2 levels above 250 μl l −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation was decreased by UV‐B only at internal CO 2 levels above 250 μl l −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B increased flavonoid accumulation in lower epidermis and mesophyll by day eight.

Organ / stage
lower epidermis and the mesophylle0
Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
flavonoid (saponarin and lutonarin) accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By the 8th day of growth, UV‐B increased flavonoid (saponarin and lutonarin) accumulation in both the lower epidermis and the mesophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 40% of saponarin was in the lower epidermis under all conditions.

Organ / stage
lower epidermise0
Outcome
saponarine0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
under all experimental conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“about 40% of the saponarin and 20% of the lutonarin were in the lower epidermis under all experimental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 20% of lutonarin was in the lower epidermis under all conditions.

Organ / stage
lower epidermise0
Outcome
lutonarine0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
under all experimental conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20% of the lutonarin were in the lower epidermis under all experimental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glasshouse conditions were too variable for reproducible growth and photosynthesis determinations.

Outcome
reproducible determination of growth and photosynthesise0
Qualifier
too variablee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glasshouse conditions proved too variable for reproducible determination of growth and photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glasshouse conditions were reliable for developmental flavonoid changes.

Outcome
developmental changes in flavonoid (saponarin and lutonarin) accumulatione0
Value
up to 800 μmol m −2 s −1 PARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were reliable for determining developmental changes in flavonoid (saponarin and lutonarin) accumulation and provided up to 800 μmol m −2 s −1 PAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the glasshouse UV-B leaves had roughly 50% more saponarin than controls.

Treatment
UV‐Be1
Outcome
saponarine0
Direction
moree0
Value
ca 509e0
Comparator
controlse1
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ca 509 more saponarin and 100% more lutonarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the glasshouse UV‐B‐grown leaves had more flavonoids than controls al all stages from 5 to 30 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the glasshouse UV-B leaves had 100% more lutonarin than controls.

Treatment
UV‐Be1
Outcome
lutonarine0
Direction
moree0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
controlse1
Setting
glasshousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% more lutonarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the glasshouse UV‐B‐grown leaves had more flavonoids than controls al all stages from 5 to 30 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble ferulic acid esters were similar across conditions on days five and twenty or later.

Outcome
soluble (vacuolar) ferulic acid esterse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
on day 5. and on day 20 or latere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of soluble (vacuolar) ferulic acid esters were similar under all conditions on day 5. and on day 20 or later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble ferulic acid esters were higher in UV-B plants on days ten and fifteen.

Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
soluble (vacuolar) ferulic acid esterse1
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
on days 10 and 15e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher in UV‐B‐grown plants on days 10 and 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1624 · show in text ↑
e1

“Levels of soluble (vacuolar) ferulic acid esters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B decreased insoluble ferulic acid esters on a whole leaf basis.

Organ / stage
whole leafe0
Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
insoluble (cell‐wall‐bound) ferulic acid esterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐B decreased insoluble (cell‐wall‐bound) ferulic acid esters on a whole leaf basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B increased insoluble ferulic acid esters in the lower epidermis.

Organ / stage
lower epidermise0
Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
insoluble (cell‐wall‐bound) ferulic acid esterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐B decreased insoluble (cell‐wall‐bound) ferulic acid esters on a whole leaf basis but significantly increased this fraction in the lower epidermis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A had no significant effect on growth, photosynthesis, or ferulic acid.

Treatment
UV‐Ae0
Outcome
growth, photosynthesis or ferulic acide0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐A had no significant effects on growth, photosynthesis or ferulic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1850 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A slightly increased flavonoid accumulation.

Treatment
UV‐Ae0
Outcome
flavonoid accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐A had no significant effects on growth, photosynthesis or ferulic acid, but it slightly increased flavonoid accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.