Paper · 2013 · Revista de Ciências Agrarias - Amazon Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Intercropping of Maçã and Prata Zulu banana cultivars for the cultural management of black Sigatoka

Luadir Gasparotto; José Clério Rezende Pereira; Adônis Moreira

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the effect of intercrop planting of Ma and Prata Zulu banana cultivars in the reduction of black Sigatoka severity and in the productivity of the Ma cultivar. The treatments used were a combination of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% of plants of the Ma cultivar distributed in plots with 95, 90, 85, 80 and 75% of plants of the Prata Zulu cultivar. Four months after planting, 20 leaves infected with black Sigatoka were distributed at each plot of 200 plants as a source of inoculum. The plots were separated by strips of secondary forest approximately 20 m wide and 15 m high. Each plot was divided in four subplots. Severity evaluation was performed in leaf number 10 during the flowering period. The number of viable leaves and the weight of production (bunches, hands and fruits) were also assessed. The statistical analyses did not show differences between the treatments used. Intercrop planting was not effective in reducing the severity of black Sigatoka in the Ma cultivar and the yield was similar to that observed in monocultures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop planting of the two banana cultivars was not effective in reducing black Sigatoka severity in the Ma cultivar.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Ma cultivare0
Treatment
Intercrop plantinge0
Interactor
black Sigatokae0pathogen
Outcome
severity of black Sigatokae0
Direction
not effective in reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Prata Zulu banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercrop planting was not effective in reducing the severity of black Sigatoka in the Ma cultivar and the yield was similar to that observed in monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of the Ma banana cultivar under intercropping was similar to that in monocultures.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Ma cultivare0
Treatment
Intercrop plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Verbatim

t0

“Prata Zulu banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercrop planting was not effective in reducing the severity of black Sigatoka in the Ma cultivar and the yield was similar to that observed in monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1058 · show in text ↑

intercropping · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.