Abstract
Abstract Chemical manipulation was able to induce higher productivity in soybean through improved dry matter accumulation, increased source activity, retarding leaf senescence and yield components. The senescence percentage was negatively correlated with yield (r =−0.7669**) while the source activity was positively associated (r =+0.9167**). All the yield components had significant positive correlation with yield. The low cost urea and coconut water, foliar feeding at peak flowering and late grain filling stages improved the productivity in soybean. The maximum beneficial effect of foliar feeding was noticed in the soil where the absence of native nodulation was observed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical manipulation improved soybean productivity.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Chemical manipulatione0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chemical manipulation was able to induce higher productivity in soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical manipulation improved dry matter accumulation and source activity and retarded leaf senescence.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Chemical manipulatione1
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation, increased source activity, retarding leaf senescencee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“through improved dry matter accumulation, increased source activity, retarding leaf senescence”
t0“Soybean Productivity”
e1“Chemical manipulation”
Claim · model-written summary
Senescence percentage was negatively correlated with yield.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Organ / stage
- senescencee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- negatively correlatede0
- Value
- r =−0.7669**e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The senescence percentage was negatively correlated with yield (r =−0.7669**)”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Source activity was positively associated with yield.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Organ / stage
- source activitye0
- Outcome
- source activitye0
- Direction
- positively associatede0
- Value
- r =+0.9167**e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while the source activity was positively associated (r =+0.9167**)”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield components had significant positive correlations with yield.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Organ / stage
- yield componentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- positive correlatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the yield components had significant positive correlation with yield.”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar urea feeding improved soybean productivity.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Organ / stage
- peak flowering and late grain filling stagese0
- Treatment
- ureae0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The low cost urea and coconut water, foliar feeding at peak flowering and late grain filling stages improved the productivity in soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar coconut water feeding improved soybean productivity.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- coconut watere0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The low cost urea and coconut water, foliar feeding at peak flowering and late grain filling stages improved the productivity in soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding benefit was greatest where native nodulation was absent.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Outcome
- beneficial effect of foliar feedinge0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Setting
- soil where the absence of native nodulation was observede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum beneficial effect of foliar feeding was noticed in the soil where the absence of native nodulation was observed.”
t0“Soybean”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
317 papers in the same direction as this paper · 91 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- negative
412 papers more in this group
See all 416 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.