Paper · 1967 · Annals of Applied Biology

The role of wounds in the infection of oranges by Penicillium digitatum Sacc

J. A. KAVANAGH; R. K. S. WOOD

11
claims
28
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Inocula of spores of Penicillium digitatum in water applied to apparently uninjured skin of oranges do not cause lesions to develop. Addition of citric acid, orange juice, or various extracts of rind had little effect on susceptibility to infection. When spores in water are applied to wounds made between oil vesicles, lesions develop only from wounds that penetrate deeply into the albedo. The flavedo of most oranges seems to be resistant to infection even when damaged, but in a few consignments it showed much less resistance. Increasing the number of conidia in the inoculum caused more lesions to develop but some fruits developed lesions from inocula containing very few spores. The method and timing of spore application to wounds had a considerable effect on the incidence of lesions; emanations from infected fruit had no effect. Lesions developed more rapidly and readily when suspensions of spores in water were applied to wounds in the skin that damaged oil vesicles; wounds as shallow as 0–25 mm allowed lesions to develop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore inocula applied to apparently uninjured orange skin did not cause lesions to develop.

Taxon
orangese1
Treatment
Inocula of spores of Penicillium digitatum in water applied to apparently uninjured skine1
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume1pathogen
Outcome
lesions to develope1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Inocula of spores of Penicillium digitatum in water applied to apparently uninjured skin of oranges do not cause lesions to develop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid, orange juice or rind extracts had little effect on orange susceptibility to infection by Penicillium digitatum.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
Addition of citric acid, orange juice, or various extracts of rinde2
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to infectione2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“Addition of citric acid, orange juice, or various extracts of rind had little effect on susceptibility to infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On oranges, lesions developed only from spore-inoculated wounds that penetrated deeply into the albedo.

Taxon
orangest1
Organ / stage
albedoe3
Treatment
wounds that penetrate deeply into the albedoe3
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
lesions develope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“When spores in water are applied to wounds made between oil vesicles, lesions develop only from wounds that penetrate deeply into the albedo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–398 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flavedo of most oranges seems to be resistant to infection even when damaged.

Taxon
orangese4
Organ / stage
flavedoe4
Outcome
resistant to infectione4
Qualifier
even when damagede4

Verbatim

t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“The flavedo of most oranges seems to be resistant to infection even when damaged, but in a few consignments it showed much less resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a few orange consignments, the flavedo showed much less resistance to infection.

Taxon
orangese4
Organ / stage
flavedoe4
Outcome
resistancee4
Qualifier
in a few consignmentse4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“The flavedo of most oranges seems to be resistant to infection even when damaged, but in a few consignments it showed much less resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the number of conidia in the inoculum caused more lesions on oranges.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
Increasing the number of conidia in the inoculume5
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
lesions to develope5
Direction
moree5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing the number of conidia in the inoculum caused more lesions to develop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–619 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some orange fruits developed lesions from inocula containing very few spores.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
inocula containing very few sporese6
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
lesionse6
Qualifier
some fruitse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e6

“but some fruits developed lesions from inocula containing very few spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–693 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method and timing of spore application to wounds had a considerable effect on the incidence of lesions on oranges.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
method and timing of spore application to woundse7
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of lesionse7
Qualifier
considerable effecte7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“The method and timing of spore application to wounds had a considerable effect on the incidence of lesions; emanations from infected fruit had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emanations from infected orange fruit had no effect on the incidence of lesions.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
emanations from infected fruite7
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of lesionse7
Direction
no effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“The method and timing of spore application to wounds had a considerable effect on the incidence of lesions; emanations from infected fruit had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesions developed more rapidly and readily on oranges when spore suspensions were applied to wounds in skin that damaged oil vesicles.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
suspensions of spores in watere1
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatumt0pathogen
Outcome
Lesionse1
Direction
more rapidly and readilye1
Qualifier
wounds in the skin that damaged oil vesiclese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lesions developed more rapidly and readily when suspensions of spores in water were applied to wounds in the skin that damaged oil vesicles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–988 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On oranges, wounds as shallow as 0–25 mm allowed lesions to develop.

Taxon
orangest1
Treatment
wounds as shallow as 0–25 mme1
Outcome
lesions to develope1
Value
0–25 mme1

Verbatim

t1

“oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“wounds as shallow as 0–25 mm allowed lesions to develop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1045 · show in text ↑

citric acid · Penicillium digitatum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Penicillium digitatum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · Penicillium digitatum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Penicillium digitatum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.