Paper · 1983 · Journal of Environmental Quality

The Effect of Mount St. Helens' Volcanic Ash on Plant Growth and Mineral Uptake

V. L. Cochran; D. F. Bezdicek; L. F. Elliott; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine if unleached volcanic ash from the 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens would affect plant growth and uptake of N, P, K, Zn, and Cd. The electrical conductivity of the ash was 5.0 dS m −1 , and contained moderate amounts of available P, Ca, Mg, and SO 4 . Total Cd was 6 µ g g −1 , which is greater than that of most western soils. Swiss chard ( Beta vulgaris cicla L.) and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) were grown in Ritzville silt loam soil (mesic Calciorthidic Haploxerolls) amended with ash at rates of 0, 50, 100, 200, or 400 g kg −1 , or with sand at the rate of 200 g kg −1 . One‐half of all soils received wheat straw ( Triticum aestivum L.) to increase microbial activity. No adverse effects on either swiss chard or barley were found with ash amendments, with or without wheat straw additions. The addition of ash increased concentrations of Zn in swiss chard, but barley Zn concentrations were unchanged by ash amendments. The Cd concentration was below detectable limits in barley for all treatments and was decreased by ash amendments in swiss chard, with or without incorporated wheat straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ash amendments caused no adverse effects on swiss chard growth, with or without wheat straw.

Treatment
ash amendmentse0
Outcome
adverse effectse0
Direction
No adverse effectse0
Qualifier
with or without wheat straw additionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No adverse effects on either swiss chard or barley were found with ash amendments, with or without wheat straw additions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ash amendments caused no adverse effects on barley growth, with or without wheat straw.

Treatment
ash amendmentse0
Outcome
adverse effectse0
Direction
No adverse effectse0
Qualifier
with or without wheat straw additionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No adverse effects on either swiss chard or barley were found with ash amendments, with or without wheat straw additions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ash increased Zn concentrations in swiss chard.

Treatment
addition of ashe0
Outcome
concentrations of Zne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of ash increased concentrations of Zn in swiss chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley Zn concentrations were unchanged by ash.

Treatment
ash amendmentse0
Outcome
barley Zn concentrationse0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley Zn concentrations were unchanged by ash amendments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley Cd concentrations were below detection for all treatments.

Outcome
Cd concentratione0
Qualifier
below detectable limitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd concentration was below detectable limits in barley for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ash decreased Cd concentrations in swiss chard with or without wheat straw.

Treatment
ash amendmentse0
Outcome
Cd concentratione1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
with or without incorporated wheat strawe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was decreased by ash amendments in swiss chard, with or without incorporated wheat straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Cd concentration was below detectable limits in barley for all treatments and was decreased by ash amendments in swiss chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1125 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.