Paper · 1998 · Agronomy Journal

Integrated Weed Management Using Narrow Corn Row Spacing, Herbicides, and Cultivation

Gregg A. Johnson; Thomas R. Hoverstad; Rene E. Greenwald

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
94
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Potential increases in corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield have led many producers to consider using narrow corn rows. Narrow row spacing is also thought to play a role in reducing weed interference through enhanced light interception by the crop. However, there is little information on how narrow row spacing and cultivation fit into an integrated weed and crop management strategy. The objective of this research was to investigate the potential for reduced herbicide amount (either through below‐label rate and/or banded applications) using narrow corn crop row spacing and timely cultivation. Field studies were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at the University of Minnesota Southern Experiment Station in Waseca. Corn was planted in 51‐ and 76‐cm row spacings. Within each row‐spacing treatment, plots were either cultivated or not cultivated. Eight herbicide treatments were applied to each row space and cultivation plot. Corn row spacing had little impact on giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi Herrm.) and common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) visual control, density, biomass, or height. Cultivation was the single most important variable in reducing the amount of herbicide used. Grain yield was not increased by planting corn in narrow rows. Increased grain yield and weed control reported in previous research studies using narrow row spacing may be due to the choice of hybrid, plant population, and weed spectrum present.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn row spacing had little impact on giant foxtail and common ragweed control, density, biomass or height.

Treatment
Corn row spacinge2
Interactor
giant foxtaile2weed
Second interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae2weed
Outcome
visual control, density, biomass, or heighte2
Direction
little impacte2
Setting
University of Minnesota Southern Experiment Station in Wasecae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · Second interactorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potential increases in corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield have led many producers to consider using narrow corn rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field studies were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at the University of Minnesota Southern Experiment Station in Waseca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corn row spacing had little impact on giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi Herrm.) and common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) visual control, density, biomass, or height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation was the single most important variable in reducing the amount of herbicide used, compared with not cultivated plots.

Treatment
Cultivatione3
Outcome
amount of herbicide usede3
Direction
reducinge3
Comparator
not cultivatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potential increases in corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield have led many producers to consider using narrow corn rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Cultivation was the single most important variable in reducing the amount of herbicide used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1192 · show in text ↑
e4

“Within each row‐spacing treatment, plots were either cultivated or not cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting corn in narrow rows did not increase grain yield.

Treatment
planting corn in narrow rowse5
Outcome
Grain yielde5
Direction
not increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potential increases in corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield have led many producers to consider using narrow corn rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–122 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yield was not increased by planting corn in narrow rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1255 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesiscited backgroundbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increased grain yield and weed control reported in earlier narrow-row studies may be due to hybrid choice, plant population and weed spectrum.

Outcome
Increased grain yield and weed controle6
Qualifier
choice of hybrid, plant population, and weed spectrum presente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potential increases in corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield have led many producers to consider using narrow corn rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–122 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increased grain yield and weed control reported in previous research studies using narrow row spacing may be due to the choice of hybrid, plant population, and weed spectrum present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1438 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

density · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.