Paper · 2001 · Weed Technology

Effect of Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) Population and Row Spacing on Light Interception, Corn Yield, and Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) Growth1

BRENT E. THARP; JAMES J. KELLS

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
73
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Management of corn (Zea mays) row spacings and populations has been used for many years to increase corn productivity. In 1998 and 1999, nonirrigated corn was grown in 38-, 56-, and 76-cm row spacings at populations averaging 59,300, 72,900, and 83,900 plants/ha in Michigan. Glufosinate at 0.29 kg/ha was applied to common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) averaging 5 cm in height in each plot. Corn population and row spacing did not influence weed emergence following application of glufosinate. Common lambsquarters biomass and seed production were reduced when grown under canopies of corn planted in populations exceeding 72,900 plants/ha. Common lambsquarters biomass was reduced as corn row spacings were reduced from 76 to 38 cm. Early-season interception of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) by corn canopies increased as row spacings decreased, but differences were not apparent later in the season. Interception of PAR was similar throughout the season when corn populations exceeded 72,900 plants/ha. Corn yields were not affected by row spacing, but they were increased with corn populations of 72,900 plants/ha or higher.Nomenclature: Glufosinate; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L,. #3 CHEAL; corn, Zea mays L. ‘DK 493GR’.Additional index words: Crop density, herbicide-tolerant crops, narrow-row corn.Abbreviation: PAR, photosynthetic active radiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn population and row spacing did not influence post-glufosinate weed emergence.

Treatment
Corn population and row spacinge0
Interactor
Common LambsquartersChenopodium albumt0weed
Outcome
weed emergencee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn population and row spacing did not influence weed emergence following application of glufosinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Lambsquarters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn populations above 72,900 plants/ha reduced lambsquarters biomass.

Treatment
populations exceeding 72,900 plants/hae0
Interactor
Common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
Common lambsquarters biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common lambsquarters biomass and seed production were reduced when grown under canopies of corn planted in populations exceeding 72,900 plants/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn populations above 72,900 plants/ha reduced lambsquarters seed production.

Treatment
populations exceeding 72,900 plants/hae0
Interactor
Common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common lambsquarters biomass and seed production were reduced when grown under canopies of corn planted in populations exceeding 72,900 plants/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrowing corn rows from 76 to 38 cm reduced lambsquarters biomass.

Treatment
38 cme0
Interactor
Common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
Common lambsquarters biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
76e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common lambsquarters biomass was reduced as corn row spacings were reduced from 76 to 38 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrower corn rows increased early-season PAR interception.

Treatment
row spacings decreasede0
Outcome
interception of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Early-seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early-season interception of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) by corn canopies increased as row spacings decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later-season PAR interception differences by row spacing were not apparent.

Treatment
row spacingse1
Outcome
differencese0
Direction
not apparente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences were not apparent later in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“as row spacings decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAR interception was similar through the season above 72,900 corn plants/ha.

Treatment
corn populations exceeded 72,900 plants/hae0
Outcome
Interception of PARe0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interception of PAR was similar throughout the season when corn populations exceeded 72,900 plants/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was unaffected by row spacing.

Treatment
row spacinge0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were not affected by row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields increased at populations of at least 72,900 plants/ha.

Treatment
corn populations of 72,900 plants/ha or highere0
Outcome
Corn yieldse1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were increased with corn populations of 72,900 plants/ha or higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields were not affected by row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

138 papers in the same direction as this paper · 519 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.