Paper · 2014 · PLoS ONE

Surface Survival and Internalization of Salmonella through Natural Cracks on Developing Cantaloupe Fruits, Alone or in the Presence of the Melon Wilt Pathogen Erwinia tracheiphila

Dhiraj Gautam; Shefali Dobhal; Mark E. Payton; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Outbreaks of foodborne illness attributed to the consumption of Salmonella-tainted cantaloupe have occurred repeatedly, but understanding of the ecology of Salmonella on cantaloupe fruit surfaces is limited. We investigated the interactions between Salmonella enterica Poona, the plant pathogenic bacterium Erwinia tracheiphila, and cantaloupe fruit. Fruit surfaces were inoculated at the natural cracking stage by spreading S. enterica and E. tracheiphila, 20 µl at 107 cfu/ml, independently or together, over a 2×2 cm rind area containing a crack. Microbial and microscopic analyses were performed at 0, 9 and 24 days post inoculation (DPI). Even at 24 DPI (fruit maturity) S. enterica was detected on 14% and 40% of the fruit inoculated with S. enterica alone and the two-pathogen mixture, respectively. However, the population of S. enterica declined gradually after initial inoculation. E. tracheiphila, inoculated alone or together with Salmonella, caused watersoaked lesions on cantaloupe fruit; but we could not conclude in this study that S. enterica survival on the fruit surface was enhanced by the presence of those lesions. Of fruit inoculated with E. tracheiphila alone and sampled at 24 DPI, 61% had watersoaked lesions on the surface. In nearly half of those symptomatic fruits the watersoaking extended into the sub-rind mesocarp, and E. tracheiphila was recovered from that tissue in 50% of the symptomatic fruit. In this work, E. tracheiphila internalized through natural cracks on developing fruits. S. enterica was never detected in the fruit interior (ca. 2-3 mm below rind surface) under the limited conditions of our experiments, but the possibility that it, or other human pathogens that contaminate fresh produce, might also do so should be investigated under a wider range of conditions and produce types.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 days, Salmonella was detected on 14% of fruit inoculated with Salmonella alone.

Organ / stage
fruit maturitye0
Treatment
S. enterica alonee0
Interactor
S. entericaSalmonella entericae0pathogen
Outcome
S. enterica was detectede0
Value
14%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica · InteractorCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even at 24 DPI (fruit maturity) S. enterica was detected on 14% and 40% of the fruit inoculated with S. enterica alone and the two-pathogen mixture, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cantaloupe fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–350 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 days, Salmonella was detected on 40% of fruit inoculated with both pathogens.

Treatment
two-pathogen mixturee0
Interactor
S. entericaSalmonella entericae0pathogen
Second interactor
E. tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae2pathogen
Outcome
S. enterica was detectede0
Value
40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica · InteractorCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · Second interactorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even at 24 DPI (fruit maturity) S. enterica was detected on 14% and 40% of the fruit inoculated with S. enterica alone and the two-pathogen mixture, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cantaloupe fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–350 · show in text ↑
e2

“S. enterica and E. tracheiphila”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Salmonella population declined gradually after inoculation.

Interactor
S. entericaSalmonella entericae0pathogen
Outcome
population of S. entericae0
Direction
declined graduallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica · InteractorCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the population of S. enterica declined gradually after initial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cantaloupe fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Erwinia tracheiphila alone caused watersoaked lesions on cantaloupe fruit.

Treatment
E. tracheiphila, inoculated alonee0
Interactor
E. tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Outcome
watersoaked lesionse0
Direction
causede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. tracheiphila, inoculated alone or together with Salmonella, caused watersoaked lesions on cantaloupe fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Erwinia tracheiphila with Salmonella caused watersoaked lesions on cantaloupe fruit.

Treatment
together with Salmonellae0
Interactor
E. tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Second interactor
SalmonellaSalmonellae0pathogen
Outcome
watersoaked lesionse0
Direction
causede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salmonella
Salmonella · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)NIAID : These high-resolution (300 dpi) images may be downloaded directly from this site. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. tracheiphila, inoculated alone or together with Salmonella, caused watersoaked lesions on cantaloupe fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1001 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 days, 61% of fruit inoculated only with E. tracheiphila had surface watersoaked lesions.

Treatment
E. tracheiphila alonee0
Interactor
E. tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Outcome
watersoaked lesions on the surfacee0
Value
61%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of fruit inoculated with E. tracheiphila alone and sampled at 24 DPI, 61% had watersoaked lesions on the surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cantaloupe fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–350 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watersoaking extended into sub-rind mesocarp in nearly half the symptomatic fruit.

Taxon
fruitse0
Organ / stage
sub-rind mesocarpe0
Outcome
watersoaking extended into the sub-rind mesocarpe0
Value
nearly halfe0

Verbatim

e0

“In nearly half of those symptomatic fruits the watersoaking extended into the sub-rind mesocarp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. tracheiphila was recovered from sub-rind mesocarp in 50% of symptomatic fruit.

Taxon
fruite0
Organ / stage
sub-rind mesocarpe1
Interactor
E. tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Outcome
E. tracheiphila was recoverede0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. tracheiphila was recovered from that tissue in 50% of the symptomatic fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1431 · show in text ↑
e1

“sub-rind mesocarp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. tracheiphila entered developing fruit through natural cracks.

Taxon
fruitse0
Organ / stage
developing fruitse0
Interactor
E. tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Outcome
internalized through natural crackse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. tracheiphila internalized through natural cracks on developing fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1519 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salmonella was not detected 2-3 mm below the rind surface under the tested conditions.

Taxon
fruite0
Organ / stage
fruit interiore0
Interactor
S. entericaSalmonella entericae0pathogen
Outcome
S. enterica was never detectede0
Qualifier
ca. 2-3 mm below rind surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica · InteractorCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. enterica was never detected in the fruit interior (ca. 2-3 mm below rind surface) under the limited conditions of our experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1652 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 13 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.