Paper · 2000 · Agronomy Journal

Preplant Slow‐Release Nitrogen Fertilizers Produce Similar Bell Pepper Yields as Split Applications of Soluble Fertilizer

Elizabeth A. Guertal

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
58
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Slow‐release N materials are used to reduce N leaching losses from sandy soils and extend N availability over a growing season. The objective of this research was to examine the effectiveness of preplant sulfur‐coated urea (SCU) and polyolefin resin‐coated urea (PCU) N fertilizers compared to split applications of soluble fertilizer on green bell pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.) yield and quality. The 3‐yr experiment consisted of green bell peppers grown on 15‐cm raised beds utilizing plastic mulch and drip irrigation. Treatments were N source (preplant SCU, preplant PCU, and fertigated ammonium nitrate) and N rate (90, 135, 180, or 225 kg N ha −1 ). Ammonium nitrate (AN) was applied as a split application, with 20% preplant and 80% applied every‐other week in five equal applications. Other N sources were applied 100% preplant. A zero N control was also included. Collected data included plant height, leaf N content, and fruit yield and quality. In two of three years pepper yield was maximized at or near the Alabama recommended rate of 135 kg N ha −1 . Nitrogen source rarely affected the partitioning of harvested peppers into grade groups. Adding N from any N source decreased percent nonmarketable yield (cull) and increased the percentage of marketable yield that was large (U.S. 1) peppers. There were few consistent differences in pepper yield or quality due to N source. Given cost considerations of drip application and N sources, slow‐release N materials may be a viable option for small‐scale growers not using drip application systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper yield peaked near 135 kg N ha −1 in two of three years.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
135 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
pepper yielde0
Direction
maximizede0
Qualifier
In two of three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In two of three years pepper yield was maximized at or near the Alabama recommended rate of 135 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source rarely affected the distribution of harvested peppers among grades.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Nitrogen sourcee0
Outcome
partitioning of harvested peppers into grade groupse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen source rarely affected the partitioning of harvested peppers into grade groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen from any source reduced the percentage of nonmarketable yield.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Adding N from any N sourcee0
Outcome
percent nonmarketable yield (cull)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding N from any N source decreased percent nonmarketable yield (cull)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen from any source increased the share of marketable yield in large peppers.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Adding N from any N sourcee0
Outcome
percentage of marketable yield that was large (U.S. 1) pepperse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding N from any N source decreased percent nonmarketable yield (cull) and increased the percentage of marketable yield that was large (U.S. 1) peppers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper yield and quality showed few consistent differences among nitrogen sources.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
N sourcee0
Outcome
pepper yield or qualitye0
Direction
few consistent differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There were few consistent differences in pepper yield or quality due to N source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider slow-release nitrogen viable for small growers without drip systems.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Outcome
slow‐release N materials may be a viable option for small‐scale growers not using drip application systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“slow‐release N materials may be a viable option for small‐scale growers not using drip application systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.