Paper · 2014 · Journal of Agricultural Sciences Belgrade

Effects of aqueous plant extracts and inorganic fertilizer on the germination, growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.)

Kanayo Chukwuka; Maxwell Obiakara; Israel Ogunsumi

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Screen house experiments were carried out to examine the effects of aqueous leaf extracts of Tithonia diversifolia (Ti) and Vernonia amygdalina (Ve), as well as NPK fertilizer (15-15-15) on the germination, growth and development of maize. Fresh leaves were collected, washed with tap water, chopped and pounded, soaked in distilled water and filtered. The two filtrates were used to prepare extracts at 50 and 100% w/v. Four maize seeds were placed in Petri dishes laid out in a completely randomized design with five replicates. In every Petri dish 10 ml of extract per treatment was added. A control experiment with distilled water was also set up. Also, in a completely randomized design with four replicates, 4-week-old potted maize plants were treated with 500 ml of each extract as well as with 1.52 g of NPK fertilizer. The results showed that the germination percentage of the seeds followed the order Ti50 - Control - Ve50. The seeds treated with aqueous extracts of T. diversifolia and V. amygdalina at 100% w/v produced lower but equal germination percentage. The seedling radicle growth was significantly inhibited by the aqueous extracts of Ti100, Ve50 and Ve100 (p?0.05). The inhibition was dose-dependent and more pronounced in seeds treated with extracts of V. amygdalina. The aqueous extract of T. diversifolia (50% w/v) and control influenced radicle growth substantially. All the extracts inhibited the plumule development compared to the control. On the other hand, growth, development and yield were not significantly affected by the plant extracts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination ranked Ti50, control and Ve50 in that order.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Qualifier
Ti50 - Control - Ve50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the germination percentage of the seeds followed the order Ti50 - Control - Ve50.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two 100% leaf extracts produced equally lower maize seed germination.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
aqueous extracts of T. diversifolia and V. amygdalina at 100% w/ve0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
equale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds treated with aqueous extracts of T. diversifolia and V. amygdalina at 100% w/v produced lower but equal germination percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ti100 extract significantly inhibited maize radicle growth.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Ti100e0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seedling radicle growth was significantly inhibited by the aqueous extracts of Ti100, Ve50 and Ve100 (p?0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ve50 extract significantly inhibited maize radicle growth.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Ve50e0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seedling radicle growth was significantly inhibited by the aqueous extracts of Ti100, Ve50 and Ve100 (p?0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ve100 extract significantly inhibited maize radicle growth.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Ve100e0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seedling radicle growth was significantly inhibited by the aqueous extracts of Ti100, Ve50 and Ve100 (p?0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radicle inhibition increased with extract dose.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
extracts of V. amygdalinae0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
dose-dependente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition was dose-dependent and more pronounced in seeds treated with extracts of V. amygdalina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. amygdalina extract caused more radicle inhibition than the other extract.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
extracts of V. amygdalinae0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition was dose-dependent and more pronounced in seeds treated with extracts of V. amygdalina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ti50 extract and control substantially influenced radicle growth.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Qualifier
substantiallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aqueous extract of T. diversifolia (50% w/v) and control influenced radicle growth substantially.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All extracts inhibited maize plumule development relative to control.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
All the extractse0
Outcome
plumule developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the extracts inhibited the plumule development compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts did not significantly affect maize growth, development or yield.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
plant extractse0
Outcome
growth, development and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, development and yield were not significantly affected by the plant extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–124 · show in text ↑

Tithonia diversifolia · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

125 papers: 118 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

botanical · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 57 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.