Paper · 2006 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Structure and Fertilizer Properties of Byproducts Formed in the Synthesis of EDDHA

Lourdes Hernández-Apaolaza; Sonia García-Marco; Paloma Nadal; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The synthesis of commercial EDDHA produces o,o-EDDHA as the main reaction product, together with a mixture of regioisomers (o,p-EDDHA and p,p-EDDHA) and other unknown byproducts also able to complex Fe3+. These compounds have been obtained by direct synthesis, and their structures have been determined by ESI-MS analysis as oligomeric EDDHA-like products, formed by polysubstitution in the phenolic rings. Short-term experiments show that the iron complexes of samples enriched in these oligomeric byproducts have adequate stability in solution, but a significant amount of them is lost after interaction with soils and soil materials. Mildly chlorotic cucumber plants are able to reduce iron better from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+ than from the iron complexes of the oligomeric byproducts. In hydroponics, the chlorotic soybean susceptible plants have a lower potential for Fe absorption from these byproducts than from o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+. In the studied conditions, the iron chelates of EDDHA byproducts do not have the long-lasting effect shown by o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and present a less efficient fast-action effect than the o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorotic cucumber reduced iron better from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+ than from oligomeric byproducts.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+e0
Outcome
reduce irone0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
iron complexes of the oligomeric byproductse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mildly chlorotic cucumber plants are able to reduce iron better from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+ than from the iron complexes of the oligomeric byproducts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorotic soybean had lower Fe absorption potential from byproducts than from o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
these byproductse0
Outcome
potential for Fe absorptione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+e0
Setting
hydroponicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In hydroponics, the chlorotic soybean susceptible plants have a lower potential for Fe absorption from these byproducts than from o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorotic soybean had lower Fe absorption potential from byproducts than from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
these byproductse0
Outcome
potential for Fe absorptione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+e0
Setting
hydroponicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In hydroponics, the chlorotic soybean susceptible plants have a lower potential for Fe absorption from these byproducts than from o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and from o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Byproduct chelates lacked the long lasting effect of o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
iron chelates of EDDHA byproductse0
Outcome
long-lasting effecte0
Direction
do not havee0
Comparator
o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the iron chelates of EDDHA byproducts do not have the long-lasting effect shown by o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and present a less efficient fast-action effect than the o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“the chlorotic soybean susceptible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Byproduct chelates had a less efficient fast action effect than o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
iron chelates of EDDHA byproductse0
Outcome
fast-action effecte0
Direction
less efficiente0
Comparator
o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the iron chelates of EDDHA byproducts do not have the long-lasting effect shown by o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and present a less efficient fast-action effect than the o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“the chlorotic soybean susceptible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–836 · show in text ↑

iron(3+) · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.