Paper · 1991 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of long‐term herbicide use, irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on soil fertility in an apple orchard

Neil A Hipps; Timothy J Samuelson

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In 1972 an experiment was set up to investigate the long‐term effects of herbicide, irrigation and two rates of nitrochalk fertiliser application on soil fertility in a Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard. Samples taken in 1986 showed that uncultivated soil which had been maintained bare by herbicide had much lower organic C, total N and extractable K and Mg concentrations than soil which had been maintained under grass. Extractable P concentrations were lower in soil under grass than in soil under herbicide. In the absence of grass, soil pH was slightly lower than in its presence. All these effects were much greater at depths above 7·5 cm than below. Irrigation of the grass slightly increased organic C and total N levels at 0–7·5 cm compared with unirrigated grass but had no effect on extractable P, K and Mg. Increasing the fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had no effect on organic C, total N, extractable P and K. Yet, throughout the soil profile, extractable Mg concentrations were greater at the low than at the high N fertiliser rate. In a seedling growth test on soil taken from the orchard in 1988 (and confirmed to be free from residual herbicide), apple seedlings grown in soil which had previously been under grass grew significantly better than those in soil which had been bare. These differences were ascribed to a greater rate of N mineralisation in the soil formerly under grass. The results of this trial indicate that to safeguard soil fertility it is necessary to maintain a grass cover in the orchard. In addition, fertiliser application on newly planted trees should be adjusted to take account of the presence or absence of grass in the previous soil management treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bare under herbicide had lower organic C and total N than soil under grass.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
maintained bare by herbicidee1
Outcome
organic C, total Ne1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
soil which had been maintained under grasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samples taken in 1986 showed that uncultivated soil which had been maintained bare by herbicide had much lower organic C, total N and extractable K and Mg concentrations than soil which had been maintained under grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bare under herbicide had lower extractable K and Mg than soil under grass.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
maintained bare by herbicidee1
Outcome
extractable K and Mge1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
soil which had been maintained under grasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samples taken in 1986 showed that uncultivated soil which had been maintained bare by herbicide had much lower organic C, total N and extractable K and Mg concentrations than soil which had been maintained under grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable P was lower in soil under grass than in soil under herbicide.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
soil under grasse1
Outcome
Extractable P concentrationse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
soil under herbicidee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Extractable P concentrations were lower in soil under grass than in soil under herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the absence of grass, soil pH was slightly lower than in its presence.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
In the absence of grasse1
Outcome
soil pHe1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
slightlye1
Comparator
in its presencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the absence of grass, soil pH was slightly lower than in its presence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation of grass slightly increased organic C and total N at 0–7·5 cm compared with unirrigated grass.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
Irrigation of the grasse1
Outcome
organic C and total N levelse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at 0–7·5 cme1
Comparator
unirrigated grasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation of the grass slightly increased organic C and total N levels at 0–7·5 cm compared with unirrigated grass but had no effect on extractable P, K and Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation of grass had no effect on extractable P, K and Mg.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
Irrigation of the grasse1
Outcome
extractable P, K and Mge1
Direction
no effecte1
Comparator
unirrigated grasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation of the grass slightly increased organic C and total N levels at 0–7·5 cm compared with unirrigated grass but had no effect on extractable P, K and Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the N fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had no effect on organic C and total N.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
Increasing the fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1e1
Outcome
organic C, total Ne1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had no effect on organic C, total N, extractable P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the N fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had no effect on extractable P and K.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
Increasing the fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1e1
Outcome
extractable P and Ke1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had no effect on organic C, total N, extractable P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable Mg was greater at the low than at the high N fertiliser rate throughout the soil profile.

Material
Cox's Orange Pippine0
Treatment
at the lowe1
Outcome
extractable Mg concentrationse1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
throughout the soil profilee1
Comparator
at the high N fertiliser ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yet, throughout the soil profile, extractable Mg concentrations were greater at the low than at the high N fertiliser rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple seedlings grown in soil previously under grass grew significantly better than those in bare soil.

Treatment
soil which had previously been under grasse1
Outcome
grewe1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
soil which had been baree1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple seedlings grown in soil which had previously been under grass grew significantly better than those in soil which had been bare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1317 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in apple seedling growth were ascribed to a greater rate of N mineralisation in soil formerly under grass.

Outcome
differencese1
Qualifier
a greater rate of N mineralisatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“These differences were ascribed to a greater rate of N mineralisation in the soil formerly under grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1421 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To safeguard soil fertility in an apple orchard, a grass cover should be maintained.

Treatment
maintain a grass covere1
Outcome
soil fertilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“to safeguard soil fertility it is necessary to maintain a grass cover in the orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertiliser application on newly planted apple trees should be adjusted for the presence or absence of grass in the previous soil management.

Taxon
newly planted treese1
Treatment
presence or absence of grasse1
Outcome
fertiliser applicatione1

Verbatim

e1

“fertiliser application on newly planted trees should be adjusted to take account of the presence or absence of grass in the previous soil management treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1720 · show in text ↑

herbicide · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 26 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.