Paper · 2013 · Journal of Phytopathology

Intercropping System with Combined Application of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas fluorescens Reduces Root Rot Incidence Caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola and Increases Seed Cotton Yield

Subbaiyan Marimuthu; Vellaisamy Ramamoorthy; Ramasamy Samiyappan; et al.

16
claims
34
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton. Field experiments were conducted to study the influences of intercropping system in cotton with inorganic fertilizer and two bioinoculants ( A zospirillum and P seudomonas) on root rot incidence and yield of cotton. The results revealed that among the intercropping systems, cotton intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio) recorded the highest rhizosphere colonization of P seudomonas fluorescens in the year 2007 and 2008 and the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.49 and 3.90; 1.02, 2.22 and 5.98% at the vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in the year 2007 and 2008, respectively. From nutrient management practices, integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPK recorded the highest rhizosphere colonization of P . fluorescens in both years and the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.32 and 3.36; 1.07, 2.01 and 5.25% at vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Cotton + S . aculeata recorded the maximum number of sympodial branches (23.5 and 20.62/plant in 2007 and 2008, respectively) and the highest seed cotton yield of 2010 and 1894 kg/ha. The highest cotton equivalent yield ( CEY ) of 2052 and 1895 kg/ha was recorded in cotton + onion system, which was closely followed by cotton + S . aculeata system that had the CEY of 2010 and 1894 kg/ha in 2007 and 2008, respectively. The increased CEY is due to increased cost of onion compared with S . aculeata . Combined application of 100% recommended dose of NPK and bioinoculants recorded the seed cotton yield of 2227 and 1983 kg/ha and CEY of 2460 and 2190 kg/ha in 2007 and 2008, respectively. The lowest root rot incidence and increased yield in cotton + S . aculeata combined with 50% NPK and bioinoculants could be due to synergistic effect among the bioinoculants and S . aculeata .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton with Sesbania at 1:1 had highest Pseudomonas rhizosphere colonization in both years.

Treatment
intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)e0
Interactor
P seudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
S esbania aculeatae0other
Outcome
rhizosphere colonization of P seudomonas fluorescense0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio) recorded the highest rhizosphere colonization of P seudomonas fluorescens in the year 2007 and 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton with Sesbania had lowest vegetative root rot, 1.40 and 1.02% in 2007 and 2008.

Organ / stage
vegetativee1
Treatment
intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)e0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
S esbania aculeatae0other
Outcome
root rot incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1.40e1
Qualifier
1.02e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.49 and 3.90; 1.02, 2.22 and 5.98% at the vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in the year 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–685 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton with Sesbania had lowest flowering root rot, 2.49 and 2.22% in the two years.

Organ / stage
floweringe1
Treatment
intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)e0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
S esbania aculeatae0other
Outcome
root rot incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.49e1
Qualifier
2.22e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.49 and 3.90; 1.02, 2.22 and 5.98% at the vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in the year 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–685 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton with Sesbania had lowest maturity root rot, 3.90 and 5.98%.

Organ / stage
maturitye1
Treatment
intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)e0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
S esbania aculeatae0other
Outcome
root rot incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
3.90e1
Qualifier
5.98%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton intercropping with S esbania aculeata (1 : 1 ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.49 and 3.90; 1.02, 2.22 and 5.98% at the vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in the year 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–685 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinoculants with 50% NPK gave highest Pseudomonas colonization in both years.

Treatment
integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPKe0
Interactor
P . fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
A zospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
rhizosphere colonization of P . fluorescense0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPK recorded the highest rhizosphere colonization of P . fluorescens in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinoculants with 50% NPK gave lowest vegetative root rot, 1.40 and 1.07%.

Organ / stage
vegetativee1
Treatment
integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPKe0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
P seudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root rot incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1.40e1
Qualifier
1.07e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.32 and 3.36; 1.07, 2.01 and 5.25% at vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinoculants with 50% NPK gave lowest flowering root rot, 2.32 and 2.01%.

Organ / stage
floweringe1
Treatment
integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPKe0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
P seudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root rot incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.32e1
Qualifier
2.01e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.32 and 3.36; 1.07, 2.01 and 5.25% at vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinoculants with 50% NPK gave lowest maturity root rot, 3.36 and 5.25%.

Organ / stage
maturitye1
Treatment
integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPKe0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
P seudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root rot incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
3.36e1
Qualifier
5.25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of A zospirillum and P seudomonas with 50% recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest root rot incidence of 1.40, 2.32 and 3.36; 1.07, 2.01 and 5.25% at vegetative, flowering and maturity stages in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus Sesbania gave maximum sympodial branches, 23.5 and 20.62/plant.

Treatment
Cotton + S . aculeatae0
Interactor
S . aculeatae0other
Outcome
number of sympodial branchese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
23.5 and 20.62/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + S . aculeata recorded the maximum number of sympodial branches (23.5 and 20.62/plant in 2007 and 2008, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus Sesbania gave highest seed yield, 2010 and 1894 kg/ha.

Treatment
Cotton + S . aculeatae0
Interactor
S . aculeatae0other
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2010 and 1894 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + S . aculeata recorded the maximum number of sympodial branches (23.5 and 20.62/plant in 2007 and 2008, respectively) and the highest seed cotton yield of 2010 and 1894 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus onion gave highest cotton equivalent yield, 2052 and 1895 kg/ha.

Treatment
cotton + onion systeme0
Interactor
onionAllium cepae0other
Outcome
cotton equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2052 and 1895 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · InteractorMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cotton equivalent yield ( CEY ) of 2052 and 1895 kg/ha was recorded in cotton + onion system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus Sesbania closely followed onion with equivalent yield 2010 and 1894 kg/ha.

Treatment
cotton + S . aculeata systeme0
Interactor
S . aculeatae0other
Outcome
CEYe0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
2010 and 1894 kg/hae0
Comparator
cotton + onion systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was closely followed by cotton + S . aculeata system that had the CEY of 2010 and 1894 kg/ha in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1456 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton + onion system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1324 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Greater onion price explained increased equivalent yield.

Outcome
increased CEYe0
Qualifier
increased cost of onion compared with S . aculeatae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The increased CEY is due to increased cost of onion compared with S . aculeata .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% NPK plus bioinoculants yielded 2227 and 1983 kg/ha seed cotton.

Treatment
Combined application of 100% recommended dose of NPK and bioinoculantse0
Interactor
P seudomonase1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
A zospirillume1symbiont
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Value
2227 and 1983 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% recommended dose of NPK and bioinoculants recorded the seed cotton yield of 2227 and 1983 kg/ha and CEY of 2460 and 2190 kg/ha in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“two bioinoculants ( A zospirillum and P seudomonas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% NPK plus bioinoculants gave equivalent yield 2460 and 2190 kg/ha.

Treatment
Combined application of 100% recommended dose of NPK and bioinoculantse0
Interactor
P seudomonase1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
A zospirillume1symbiont
Outcome
CEYe0
Value
2460 and 2190 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% recommended dose of NPK and bioinoculants recorded the seed cotton yield of 2227 and 1983 kg/ha and CEY of 2460 and 2190 kg/ha in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“two bioinoculants ( A zospirillum and P seudomonas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–255 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest synergy explains lower root rot and greater yield with Sesbania, 50% NPK and bioinoculants.

Treatment
cotton + S . aculeata combined with 50% NPK and bioinoculantse0
Interactor
R hizoctonia bataticolae1pathogen
Second interactor
P seudomonase2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lowest root rot incidence and increased yielde0
Qualifier
synergistic effect among the bioinoculants and S . aculeatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest root rot incidence and increased yield in cotton + S . aculeata combined with 50% NPK and bioinoculants could be due to synergistic effect among the bioinoculants and S . aculeata .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1918 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root rot caused by R hizoctonia bataticola is a serious threat in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“two bioinoculants ( A zospirillum and P seudomonas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–255 · show in text ↑

Allium cepa · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

intercropping · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.