Paper · 1990 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of alley sward width, irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on growth and yield of Cox's orange pippin apple trees

Neil A Hipps; Martin S Ridout; David Atkinson

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract From 1972 to 1988 an experiment was conducted which investigated the effects of four soil management treatments in combination with two rates of fertiliser application, on the growth and components of yield of Cox's Orange Pippin/MM 106 trees. By four years after planting, trees receiving irrigation and those in uncultivated soil maintained completely bare by herbicide had substantially greater girths than trees growing in narrow and wide bare soil strips between grassed alleys. This effect persisted throughout the life of the orchard, although after 16 years the girths of trees receiving irrigation were much greater than those of trees growing in bare soil. Increasing fertiliser application rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had either negligible or inconsistent effects on tree growth, fruit yield and size. The cumulative yield of fruit over 12 cropping years was much greater for trees growing in bare soil and for those receiving irrigation than for those growing in the narrow bare‐soil strip system. The increase in tree girth and yield caused by irrigation and bare soil, particularly in dry years, together with the lack of response to the larger rate of fertiliser application, suggests than water was more of a limiting factor than nitrogen supply for this orchard. Irrigation offers an alternative method of management to herbicide for increasing tree growth and fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated trees had substantially greater girths than trees between narrow and wide bare soil strips four years after planting

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
girthse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
By four years after plantinge6
Comparator
narrow and wide bare soil strips between grassed alleyse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“trees receiving irrigation and those in uncultivated soil maintained completely bare by herbicide had substantially greater girths than trees growing in narrow and wide bare soil strips between grassed alleys”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–491 · show in text ↑
e6

“By four years after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees kept completely bare by herbicide had substantially greater girths than trees between narrow and wide bare soil strips

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
uncultivated soil maintained completely bare by herbicidee0
Outcome
girthse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
narrow and wide bare soil strips between grassed alleyse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“trees receiving irrigation and those in uncultivated soil maintained completely bare by herbicide had substantially greater girths than trees growing in narrow and wide bare soil strips between grassed alleys”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 16 years the girths of irrigated trees were much greater than those of trees in bare soil

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
girthse1
Direction
much greatere1
Qualifier
after 16 yearse1
Comparator
bare soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“although after 16 years the girths of trees receiving irrigation were much greater than those of trees growing in bare soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had negligible or inconsistent effects on tree growth, fruit yield and size

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Increasing fertiliser application rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1e2
Outcome
tree growth, fruit yield and sizee2
Direction
negligiblee2
Comparator
from 63e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing fertiliser application rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had either negligible or inconsistent effects on tree growth, fruit yield and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees in bare soil had a much greater cumulative fruit yield over 12 cropping years than trees in the narrow bare-soil strip system

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
bare soile3
Outcome
cumulative yield of fruite3
Direction
much greatere3
Qualifier
over 12 cropping yearse3
Comparator
narrow bare‐soil strip systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“The cumulative yield of fruit over 12 cropping years was much greater for trees growing in bare soil and for those receiving irrigation than for those growing in the narrow bare‐soil strip system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated trees had a much greater cumulative fruit yield over 12 cropping years than trees in the narrow bare-soil strip system

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
irrigatione3
Outcome
cumulative yield of fruite3
Direction
much greatere3
Qualifier
over 12 cropping yearse3
Comparator
narrow bare‐soil strip systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“The cumulative yield of fruit over 12 cropping years was much greater for trees growing in bare soil and for those receiving irrigation than for those growing in the narrow bare‐soil strip system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1020 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Water appears to be a more limiting factor than nitrogen supply for tree growth and yield in this orchard

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
tree girth and yielde4
Qualifier
water was more of a limiting factor than nitrogen supplye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increase in tree girth and yield caused by irrigation and bare soil, particularly in dry years, together with the lack of response to the larger rate of fertiliser application, suggests than water was more of a limiting factor than nitrogen supply for this orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1290 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation is an alternative to herbicide management for increasing tree growth and fruit yield

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Irrigatione5
Outcome
tree growth and fruit yielde5
Comparator
herbicidee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“Irrigation offers an alternative method of management to herbicide for increasing tree growth and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1401 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

69 papers: 52 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

irrigation · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 150 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.