Paper · 2008 · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

GERMINATION, ENZYME ACTIVITY AND NUTRIENT CONTENTS OF HAIL STORMED CORN IN THE CASE OF CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)

Ferenc Pál‐Fám; Ildikó Kerepesi; Sándor Keszthelyi; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The optimal germinative ability, carbohydrate and in-kernel air-dry content values of corn seeds are essential for the distilling industry. Our examinations were focused on the investigations of the hailstorm and corn smut fungus [Ustilago maydis (DC.)Corda] infection effects on corn seed germination, as well as inkernel air-dry content values of the seeds. The corn samples were collected in 3. September 2007 from three plots (control, hail stormed and transition areas). Beside, smut-infected samples were collected, too. The samples were analysed by Wendei-analysis in order to get information about the in-kernel air-dry content value changes of the hail stormed and smut infected seeds. In order to supplement our study a-amylase activity, sucrose, glucose and fructose content in the first 7 days of seed germination were also investigated. In the case of hail stormed samples cob mass and in-kernel air-dry content values decreased. The smut fungus infection decreased the raw protein (-2.7 %), raw fibre (-0.3%), raw ash (-0.5%), extractable matter exempt from N (-12.9%) and starch (-9.2%) contents. It was evident that enzyme activity and sugar content in the stressed germinating was significantly lower compared with the control ones. The lowest data were detected in the seeds originating from corn smut fungus infected plants. Our results clearly show that stress conditions applied altered not only the chemical components in the seeds but decreased their germinating activity as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hail reduced corn cob mass and seed air dry content.

Treatment
hail stormed samplese0
Outcome
cob mass and in-kernel air-dry content valuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of hail stormed samples cob mass and in-kernel air-dry content values decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“HAIL STORMED CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smut infection reduced raw protein by -2.7 %.

Treatment
smut fungus infectione0
Interactor
USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDAt0pathogen
Outcome
raw proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-2.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smut fungus infection decreased the raw protein (-2.7 %), raw fibre (-0.3%), raw ash (-0.5%), extractable matter exempt from N (-12.9%) and starch (-9.2%) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smut infection reduced raw fibre by -0.3%.

Treatment
smut fungus infectione0
Interactor
USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDAt0pathogen
Outcome
raw fibree0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-0.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smut fungus infection decreased the raw protein (-2.7 %), raw fibre (-0.3%), raw ash (-0.5%), extractable matter exempt from N (-12.9%) and starch (-9.2%) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smut infection reduced raw ash by -0.5%.

Treatment
smut fungus infectione0
Interactor
USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDAt0pathogen
Outcome
raw ashe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-0.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smut fungus infection decreased the raw protein (-2.7 %), raw fibre (-0.3%), raw ash (-0.5%), extractable matter exempt from N (-12.9%) and starch (-9.2%) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smut infection reduced extractable matter exempt from N by -12.9%.

Treatment
smut fungus infectione0
Interactor
USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDAt0pathogen
Outcome
extractable matter exempt from Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-12.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smut fungus infection decreased the raw protein (-2.7 %), raw fibre (-0.3%), raw ash (-0.5%), extractable matter exempt from N (-12.9%) and starch (-9.2%) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smut infection reduced starch by -9.2%.

Treatment
smut fungus infectione0
Interactor
USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDAt0pathogen
Outcome
starche0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-9.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smut fungus infection decreased the raw protein (-2.7 %), raw fibre (-0.3%), raw ash (-0.5%), extractable matter exempt from N (-12.9%) and starch (-9.2%) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enzyme activity and sugar content in stressed germinating seeds were significantly lower than controls.

Treatment
stressed germinatinge0
Outcome
enzyme activity and sugar contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enzyme activity and sugar content in the stressed germinating was significantly lower compared with the control ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“HAIL STORMED CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds from smut infected plants had the lowest measured values.

Interactor
USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDAt0pathogen
Outcome
enzyme activity and sugar contente1
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest data were detected in the seeds originating from corn smut fungus infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“enzyme activity and sugar content in the stressed germinating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN SMUT FUNGUS (USTILAGO MAYDIS (DC.)CORDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress conditions reduced germinating activity.

Treatment
stress conditionse0
Outcome
germinating activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress conditions applied altered not only the chemical components in the seeds but decreased their germinating activity as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“HAIL STORMED CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–71 · show in text ↑

infection · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

infection · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.