Paper · 2005 · HortScience

The Effects of Conditioning Strawberry Plug Plants under Altered Red/Far-red Light Environments

Brent L. Black; Harry J. Swartz; Gerald F. Deitzer; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of altered red/far-red light environment on subsequent field performance of strawberry plug plants was tested. Two wavelength-selective plastic films were compared to neutral shade and full-sun control for conditioning `Chandler' strawberry plug plants before transplanting to a winter production system. The following year, plug plants of `Chandler', `Sweet Charlie', and `Allstar' were conditioned under the same treatments, with the addition of a continuous incandescent light and a short-day photoperiod, and plant performance was followed in the winter production system in Florida, a cold-climate annual hill system in Maryland, and in a low-input greenhouse production system. During the first year, the red light-filtering film slightly advanced fruiting in Florida. However, during the second year, the effect of the red light-filtering film was not significant, and a short-day treatment resulted in a greater reduction in runnering and increased early crown and flower development. For June-bearing strawberry plants maintained above 20 °C, altering the red/far-red environment did not consistently advance flowering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red filtering film slightly advanced first-year fruiting.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
red light-filtering filme0
Outcome
fruitinge0
Direction
advancede0
Comparator
full-sun controle1
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first year, the red light-filtering film slightly advanced fruiting in Florida.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“neutral shade and full-sun control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The film effect was not significant in year two.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
red light-filtering filme0
Outcome
effecte0
Comparator
full-sun controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the second year, the effect of the red light-filtering film was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“neutral shade and full-sun control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short days reduced runnering.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
short-day treatmente0
Outcome
runneringe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
red light-filtering filme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a short-day treatment resulted in a greater reduction in runnering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“the effect of the red light-filtering film was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short days increased early crown development.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
short-day treatmente0
Outcome
crowne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
red light-filtering filme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a short-day treatment resulted in a greater reduction in runnering and increased early crown and flower development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“the effect of the red light-filtering film was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short days increased early flower development.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
short-day treatmente0
Outcome
flower developmente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
red light-filtering filme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a short-day treatment resulted in a greater reduction in runnering and increased early crown and flower development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“the effect of the red light-filtering film was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Altered red/far-red light did not consistently advance flowering above 20 °C.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
altering the red/far-red environmente0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
did not consistently advancee0
Comparator
full-sun controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For June-bearing strawberry plants maintained above 20 °C, altering the red/far-red environment did not consistently advance flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“neutral shade and full-sun control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–212 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

34 papers: 21 positive, 13 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

light · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 54 positive, 14 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.