Abstract
In South Tyrol (Italy), the organic apple market is becoming increasingly interested in the variety Pinova. This variety is appealing in terms of yield, appearance and taste, and is less susceptible to apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) than other varieties commonly grown in South Tyrol. However, the variety is susceptible to Gloeosporium rot (Gloeosporium album), difficult to control especially in moist years and/or in case of delayed harvest. Under these conditions, postharvest yield losses of up to 50% may occur. Over the last years, several different approaches to reduce yield losses have been evaluated. Preharvest acid clay (Mycosin and Ulmasud) sprays and postharvest hot water dipping treatments showed highest efficacy in reducing Gloeosporium rot. The results obtained with these control tools were presented in Part 1, while the activity of other products, which are still under discussion for the use in organic organic farming, are presented in Part 2.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Pinova was less susceptible to apple scab than other commonly grown varieties.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Pinovae1
- Interactor
- Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalise0pathogen - Outcome
- susceptible to apple scabe0
- Direction
- less susceptiblee0
- Comparator
- other varieties commonly grown in South Tyrole0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“less susceptible to apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) than other varieties commonly grown in South Tyrol”
e1“the variety Pinova”
t0“apple fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Pinova was susceptible to Gloeosporium rot.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Pinovae1
- Interactor
- Gloeosporium albumPhlyctema vagabundae0pathogen
- Outcome
- susceptible to Gloeosporium rote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the variety is susceptible to Gloeosporium rot (Gloeosporium album)”
e1“the variety Pinova”
t0“apple fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Under moist years or delayed harvest, postharvest losses can reach 50%.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Pinovat0
- Interactor
- Gloeosporium albumPhlyctema vagabundae1pathogen
- Outcome
- postharvest yield lossese0
- Value
- up to 50%e0
- Qualifier
- moist years and/or in case of delayed harveste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“difficult to control especially in moist years and/or in case of delayed harvest. Under these conditions, postharvest yield losses of up to 50% may occur.”
e1“Gloeosporium rot (Gloeosporium album)”
t0“Pinova apple fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Preharvest Mycosin acid clay sprays had high efficacy against Gloeosporium rot.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Mycosine0
- Interactor
- Gloeosporium albumPhlyctema vagabundae1pathogen
- Outcome
- Gloeosporium rote0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Preharvest acid clay (Mycosin and Ulmasud) sprays and postharvest hot water dipping treatments showed highest efficacy in reducing Gloeosporium rot.”
e1“Gloeosporium rot (Gloeosporium album)”
t0“Pinova apple fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Preharvest Ulmasud acid clay sprays had high efficacy against Gloeosporium rot.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Ulmasude0
- Interactor
- Gloeosporium albumPhlyctema vagabundae1pathogen
- Outcome
- Gloeosporium rote0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Preharvest acid clay (Mycosin and Ulmasud) sprays and postharvest hot water dipping treatments showed highest efficacy in reducing Gloeosporium rot.”
e1“Gloeosporium rot (Gloeosporium album)”
t0“Pinova apple fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest hot water dipping had high efficacy against Gloeosporium rot.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- postharvest hot water dipping treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Gloeosporium albumPhlyctema vagabundae1pathogen
- Outcome
- Gloeosporium rote0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“postharvest hot water dipping treatments showed highest efficacy in reducing Gloeosporium rot”
e1“Gloeosporium rot (Gloeosporium album)”
t0“Pinova apple fruits”
The same questions in other papers
application · Phlyctema vagabunda · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
heat · Phlyctema vagabunda · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.