Abstract
Postbloom sprays of BA thinned `McIntosh', `Delicious', `Golden Delicious', `Mutsu, `Empire', and `Abas' apples. BA at 75 to 100 mg·liter -1 was equal to NAA at 6 to 7.5 mg·liter -1 or carbaryl at 600 to 800 mg·liter -1 . BA increased fruit size, flesh firmness, and soluble solids concentration (SSC) on all cultivars evaluated. Since BA is applied during the time when cell division is occurring, it is concluded that the increased fruit size and flesh firmness were due to Increased cell numbers. Increased SSC was not due solely to increased leaf: fruit ratio. Thinning with BA was additive with other chemical thinners and no interactions were found on fruit abscission. In most eases, BA increased return bloom. Chemical names used: N-(phenylmethyl)1H-purine-6-amine [benzyladenine (BA)]; 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA); 1-naphthalenyl methylcarbamate (carbaryl); butanedioic acid mono(2,2dimethylhydrazide (daminozide); (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
BA at 75 to 100 mg/liter was equal to NAA at 6 to 7.5 mg/liter or carbaryl at 600 to 800 mg/liter in thinning apples.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- BA at 75 to 100 mg·liter -1e2
- Outcome
- Thinning Activityt0
- Direction
- equale2
- Comparator
- NAA at 6 to 7.5 mg·liter -1 or carbaryl at 600 to 800 mg·liter -1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Thinning Activity of Benzyladenine on Several Apple Cultivars”
e2“BA at 75 to 100 mg·liter -1 was equal to NAA at 6 to 7.5 mg·liter -1 or carbaryl at 600 to 800 mg·liter -1”
Claim · model-written summary
BA increased fruit size, flesh firmness and soluble solids concentration in all apple cultivars evaluated.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- BAe3
- Outcome
- fruit size, flesh firmness, and soluble solids concentration (SSC)e3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Several Apple Cultivars”
e3“BA increased fruit size, flesh firmness, and soluble solids concentration (SSC) on all cultivars evaluated”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that the increased fruit size and flesh firmness of BA-treated apples were due to increased cell numbers.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- fruit size and flesh firmnesse4
- Qualifier
- Increased cell numberse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Several Apple Cultivars”
e4“it is concluded that the increased fruit size and flesh firmness were due to Increased cell numbers”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased soluble solids concentration in apple was not due solely to an increased leaf to fruit ratio.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- SSCe5
- Qualifier
- not due solely to increased leaf: fruit ratioe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Several Apple Cultivars”
e5“Increased SSC was not due solely to increased leaf: fruit ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Thinning with BA was additive with other chemical thinners in apple.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- BAe6
- Outcome
- Thinninge6
- Direction
- additivee6
- Comparator
- other chemical thinnerse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Several Apple Cultivars”
e6“Thinning with BA was additive with other chemical thinners”
Claim · model-written summary
No interactions between BA and other chemical thinners were found on apple fruit abscission.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- BAe6
- Outcome
- fruit abscissione6
- Direction
- no interactions were founde6
- Comparator
- other chemical thinnerse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Several Apple Cultivars”
e6“Thinning with BA was additive with other chemical thinners and no interactions were found on fruit abscission”
Claim · model-written summary
In most apple trials BA increased return bloom.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- BAe7
- Outcome
- return bloome7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Qualifier
- In most easese7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Several Apple Cultivars”
e7“In most eases, BA increased return bloom”
The same questions in other papers
N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →N-benzyladenine · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.