Paper · 2001 · Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology

Critical Levels of Iron, Zinc and Boron for Cotton in Varamin Rigion

Hassan Rezaei; M. J. Malakouti

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Varamin ) an important industrial crop of Iran, is grown in 300,000 ha, with an average seed -cotton yield of 1750 Kg.ha -1 . The main obstacle in the way of increasing average cotton yield is imbalanced fertilizer use. Along with urea and triple super phosphate, cotton growers also need K, Mg, Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, and B, so these elements’ critical levels should be determined in cotton fields. Field experiments were conducted in 12 different fields in 1997 to determine critical levels of Fe, Zn, and B in soil, and to study the effects of these micronutrients on the yield and quality of cotton in Varamin region. The experiment design was a randomized complete block one (RCB) with four treatments and three replications. Treatments were; NPK, NPK+Fe, NPK+Zn, and NPK+B. Iron was applied as FeEDDHA (20 kg.ha -1 ), Zn as zinc sulfate (40 Kg.ha -1 ), and B as boric acid (20 Kg. ha -1 ) prior to planting. Average seed cotton yield, lint yield, seed index, and boll weight increased significantly by adding Fe, Zn, and B. In a cotton field with higher soil B concentrations, cotton yield decreased with B fertilizer. Critical levels of Fe, Zn, and B were determined based on Cate-Nelson graphical and analysis of variance methods. In graphical method critical levels of Fe, Zn, and B were 4.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mg.Kg -1 soil, respectively, while on the basis of analysis of variance method, these levels were 5.5, 1.1, and 1.3 mg.kg -1 soil, respectively. In one field, boll shedding decreased by Zn and Fe treatments but was not affected by B addition. Iron to Zn ratio in cotton leaves increased at Fe treatment and decreased in Zn treatments. Boron treatment increased B content of leaves. Furthermore, zinc sulfate decreased B toxicity in the cotton leaves. In short, applying micronutrients increased quality and yield of cotton in Varamin region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe, Zn, and B additions significantly increased average seed cotton yield, lint yield, seed index, and boll weight.

Treatment
Fe, Zn, and Be0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, lint yield, seed index, and boll weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average seed cotton yield, lint yield, seed index, and boll weight increased significantly by adding Fe, Zn, and B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1056 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Varamin )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B fertilizer decreased cotton yield in a field with higher soil B.

Treatment
B fertilizere0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
higher soil B concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a cotton field with higher soil B concentrations, cotton yield decreased with B fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1151 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The graphical method estimated the soil Fe critical level at 4.8 mg.Kg -1.

Outcome
critical levels of Fee0
Value
4.8e0
Qualifier
graphical methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In graphical method critical levels of Fe, Zn, and B were 4.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mg.Kg -1 soil, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The graphical method estimated the soil Zn critical level at 1.1 mg.Kg -1.

Outcome
critical levels of Fe, Zn, and Be0
Value
1.1e0
Qualifier
graphical methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In graphical method critical levels of Fe, Zn, and B were 4.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mg.Kg -1 soil, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The graphical method estimated the soil B critical level at 1.0 mg.Kg -1.

Outcome
critical levels of Fe, Zn, and Be0
Value
1.0 mg.Kg -1 soile0
Qualifier
graphical methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In graphical method critical levels of Fe, Zn, and B were 4.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mg.Kg -1 soil, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis of variance estimated the soil Fe critical level at 5.5 mg.kg -1.

Outcome
these levelse0
Value
5.5e0
Qualifier
analysis of variance methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the basis of analysis of variance method, these levels were 5.5, 1.1, and 1.3 mg.kg -1 soil, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis of variance estimated the soil Zn critical level at 1.1 mg.kg -1.

Outcome
these levelse0
Value
1.1e0
Qualifier
analysis of variance methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the basis of analysis of variance method, these levels were 5.5, 1.1, and 1.3 mg.kg -1 soil, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis of variance estimated the soil B critical level at 1.3 mg.kg -1.

Outcome
these levelse0
Value
1.3 mg.kg -1 soile0
Qualifier
analysis of variance methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the basis of analysis of variance method, these levels were 5.5, 1.1, and 1.3 mg.kg -1 soil, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn and Fe treatments decreased boll shedding in one field.

Treatment
Zn and Fe treatmentse0
Outcome
boll sheddinge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In one field, boll shedding decreased by Zn and Fe treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B addition did not affect boll shedding in one field.

Treatment
B additione0
Outcome
boll sheddinge0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In one field, boll shedding decreased by Zn and Fe treatments but was not affected by B addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe treatment increased the iron-to-zinc ratio in cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Fe treatmente0
Outcome
Iron to Zn ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron to Zn ratio in cotton leaves increased at Fe treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn treatments decreased the iron-to-zinc ratio in cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Zn treatmentse0
Outcome
Iron to Zn ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron to Zn ratio in cotton leaves increased at Fe treatment and decreased in Zn treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B treatment increased leaf B content.

Treatment
Boron treatmente0
Outcome
B content of leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boron treatment increased B content of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate decreased B toxicity in cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
zinc sulfatee0
Outcome
B toxicitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc sulfate decreased B toxicity in the cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1791 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

iron atom · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 497 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.