Paper · 2015 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Potential of soil amendments (Biochar and Gypsum) in increasing water use efficiency of Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench

Aniqa Batool; Samia Taj; Audil Rashid; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
116
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water being an essential component for plant growth and development, its scarcity poses serious threat to crops around the world. Climate changes and global warming are increasing the temperature of earth hence becoming an ultimate cause of water scarcity. It is need of the day to use potential soil amendments that could increase the plants' resistance under such situations. Biochar and gypsum were used in the present study to improve the water use efficiency (WUE) and growth of Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench (Lady's Finger). A 6 weeks experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions. Stress treatments were applied after 30 days of sowing. Plant height, leaf area, photosynthesis, transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance and WUE were determined weekly under stressed [60% field capacity (F.C.)] and non-stressed (100% F.C.) conditions. Stomatal conductance and Tr decreased and reached near to zero in stressed plants. Stressed plants also showed resistance to water stress upto 5 weeks and gradually perished at sixth week. On the other hand, WUE improved in stressed plants containing biochar and gypsum as compared to untreated plants. Biochar alone is a better strategy to promote plant growth and WUE specifically of A. esculentus, compared to its application in combination with gypsum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 60% field capacity water stress, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of Abelmoschus esculentus decreased to near zero compared with non-stressed plants.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
60% field capacity (F.C.)e2
Outcome
Stomatal conductance and Tre3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
reached near to zeroe3
Comparator
non-stressed (100% F.C.)e2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 6 weeks experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–596 · show in text ↑
e2

“under stressed [60% field capacity (F.C.)] and non-stressed (100% F.C.) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–854 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stomatal conductance and Tr decreased and reached near to zero in stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stressed Abelmoschus esculentus plants resisted water stress for up to 5 weeks.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Outcome
resistance to water stresse4
Qualifier
upto 5 weekse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“Stressed plants also showed resistance to water stress upto 5 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stressed Abelmoschus esculentus plants gradually perished at the sixth week.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Outcome
perishede5
Qualifier
at sixth weeke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“gradually perished at sixth week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency of stressed Abelmoschus esculentus improved with biochar and gypsum compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
biochar and gypsume6
Outcome
WUEe6
Direction
improvede6
Qualifier
in stressed plantse6
Comparator
untreated plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“WUE improved in stressed plants containing biochar and gypsum as compared to untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar alone is suggested to be a better strategy than biochar combined with gypsum for plant growth and WUE of A. esculentus.

Taxon
A. esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse7
Treatment
Biochar alonee7
Outcome
plant growth and WUEe7
Direction
bettere7
Comparator
in combination with gypsume7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Biochar alone is a better strategy to promote plant growth and WUE specifically of A. esculentus, compared to its application in combination with gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1311 · show in text ↑

biochar · physiology: water · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.