Abstract
Four biofertilizers (active dry yeast, phosphorene, rhizobacterium, and nitrobein) were used to fertilize `Red Roomy' grapevines. Growth and nutritional status of the vines as affected by such fertilizers during 1995 and 1996 were studied. Results showed that fertilizing the vine with all biofertilizers caused a material improvement in shoot length, leaf area, and cane thickness, and effectively enhance the nutritional status of the vines. The favorable effects of such fertilizers were in the following descending order: phosphorene, rhizobacterium, nitrobein, and active dry yeast. A great increase on growth and nutritional status of `Red Roomy' grapevines occurred as a result of supplying the vines with phosphorene or rhizobacterium as good, new biofertilizers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
All biofertilizers caused a material improvement in shoot length, leaf area and cane thickness of grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- all biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- shoot length, leaf area, and cane thicknesse1
- Direction
- material improvemente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vitis vinifera L.”
e1“fertilizing the vine with all biofertilizers caused a material improvement in shoot length, leaf area, and cane thickness”
Claim · model-written summary
All biofertilizers effectively enhanced the nutritional status of grapevines.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- all biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- nutritional statuse2
- Direction
- enhancee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vitis vinifera L.”
e1“fertilizing the vine with all biofertilizers caused a material improvement in shoot length, leaf area, and cane thickness”
e2“effectively enhance the nutritional status of the vines”
Claim · model-written summary
Favorable effects of phosphorene, rhizobacterium, nitrobein and active dry yeast followed the descending order listed.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- phosphorene, rhizobacterium, nitrobein, and active dry yeaste3
- Second interactor
- active dry yeaste3symbiont
- Outcome
- favorable effectse3
- Direction
- descending ordere3
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vitis vinifera L.”
e3“The favorable effects of such fertilizers were in the following descending order: phosphorene, rhizobacterium, nitrobein, and active dry yeast”
Claim · model-written summary
Supplying grapevines with phosphorene or rhizobacterium greatly increased growth and nutritional status.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- phosphorene or rhizobacteriume4
- Outcome
- growth and nutritional statuse4
- Direction
- great increasee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vitis vinifera L.”
e4“A great increase on growth and nutritional status of `Red Roomy' grapevines occurred as a result of supplying the vines with phosphorene or rhizobacterium”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.