Paper · 2014 · Journal of Basic Microbiology

Effect of Sinorhizobium fredii strain Sneb183 on the biological control of soybean cyst nematode in soybean

Feng Tian; Yuanyuan Wang; Xiaofeng Zhu; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines) is a major detriment to soybean production. The endophytic bacterium Sinorhizobium fredii strain Sneb183 is known to inhibit the activity of SCN. In the present study, soybean seedlings were inoculated with Sneb183, to study the penetration juveniles, and their development inside the roots. The number of cysts in the soybean roots was also examined. The induced systemic resistance in soybean was also examined through the split-root system. Our results revealed that the number of juveniles and cysts significantly decreased as a result of Sneb183 inoculation. Sneb183 also prolonged the developmental stage of SCN in the root to 30 days as compared to 27 days in the control. Furthermore, the number of nematodes in each stage was lower in the Sneb183 treated plants than control plants. We also used a split-root system to show that the S. fredii strain Sneb183 induced a systemic resistance to SCN infection in soybean. The repression rate of SCN penetration was 38.75%. Our study showed that Sneb183 can be an effective biocontrol agent for managing SCN infestation in soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sneb183 inoculation significantly decreased the number of juveniles and cysts of soybean cyst nematode compared with control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Sneb183 inoculatione2
Interactor
soybean cyst nematodeHeterodera glycinese0pest
Second interactor
Sinorhizobium fredii strain Sneb183Sinorhizobium frediie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of juveniles and cystse2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium fredii
Sinorhizobium fredii · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines) is a major detriment to soybean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The endophytic bacterium Sinorhizobium fredii strain Sneb183 is known to inhibit the activity of SCN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–197 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results revealed that the number of juveniles and cysts significantly decreased as a result of Sneb183 inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–615 · show in text ↑
e4

“the number of nematodes in each stage was lower in the Sneb183 treated plants than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sneb183-treated plants had fewer nematodes at each developmental stage than control plants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Sneb183 treated plantse4
Interactor
nematodesNematodae4pest
Second interactor
Sinorhizobium fredii strain Sneb183Sinorhizobium frediie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of nematodes in each stagee4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium fredii
Sinorhizobium fredii · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines) is a major detriment to soybean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The endophytic bacterium Sinorhizobium fredii strain Sneb183 is known to inhibit the activity of SCN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–197 · show in text ↑
e4

“the number of nematodes in each stage was lower in the Sneb183 treated plants than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sneb183 prolonged the developmental stage of SCN in the root to 30 days, compared with 27 days in the control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
roote3
Treatment
Sneb183e3
Interactor
SCNe3pest
Outcome
developmental stage of SCNe3
Direction
prolongede3
Value
30 dayse3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines) is a major detriment to soybean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sneb183 also prolonged the developmental stage of SCN in the root to 30 days as compared to 27 days in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–731 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sneb183 repressed SCN penetration in soybean by 38.75%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Interactor
SCNe6pest
Outcome
repression rate of SCN penetratione6
Value
38.75%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the S. fredii strain Sneb183 induced a systemic resistance to SCN infection in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–977 · show in text ↑
e6

“The repression rate of SCN penetration was 38.75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. fredii strain Sneb183 induced systemic resistance to SCN infection in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
Sneb183e5
Interactor
SCNe5pest
Second interactor
S. fredii strain Sneb183Sinorhizobium frediie5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
systemic resistance to SCN infectione5
Direction
inducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium fredii
Sinorhizobium fredii · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the S. fredii strain Sneb183 induced a systemic resistance to SCN infection in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–977 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sneb183 can be an effective biocontrol agent for managing SCN infestation in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe7
Outcome
effective biocontrol agent for managing SCN infestatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Our study showed that Sneb183 can be an effective biocontrol agent for managing SCN infestation in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1136 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Heterodera glycines · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.